书籍介绍
《哲学解释》一书是由美国学者戴维·E·林格从加达默尔3卷本《短论集》中选编关于哲学解释学的论文集。全书共由十三篇文章组成，分为两大部分。第一部分的七篇文章主要阐述哲学解释学的基本原理，第二部分则得在阐述学解秋学与其他哲学流派的关系。书前有林格的为英译本写一篇长序，对哲学解释学及全书内容作了详尽介绍。《哲学解释学》一书所收论文都是加达默尔于《真理与方法》出版后之所写的关哲学的文章。它们既是对《真理与方法》一书所提重要原理的进步阐述，同时也对它们作出了补充和发展。对于要想系统了解哲学解释学的人们说来，本书将是一本必读的著作。
AI导读
核心看点
- 阐述哲学解释学基本原理，补充发展《真理与方法》
- 探讨理解与语言的关系，揭示偏见的创造性价值
- 回应哈贝马斯批判，辨析传统与反思的辩证关系
适合谁读
- 系统了解哲学解释学原理的哲学专业学生
- 对西方现代哲学、现象学及诠释学感兴趣的读者
- 希望深入研读伽达默尔思想体系的学术研究者
读前提醒
- 本书为论文集，建议先读林格长序以把握全书脉络
- 理论密度高，哲学基础薄弱者建议先读《真理与方法》
- 部分篇章涉及学术争论，需结合背景知识辅助理解
读者共识
- 相比大部头著作，本书行文流畅，更易于入门阅读
- 翻译质量普遍获好评，但部分章节仍显晦涩难懂
- 对语言、游戏及艺术的分析极具启发性，值得细读
本导读基于书籍简介、目录、原文摘录、短评和书评生成，不等同于全文精读。
精彩摘录
- "从一种真正历史的观点看，20世纪当然不是指一个按年代顺序定义的时代——即从1900到2000年这么一个时代。正如19世纪事实上是以歌德和黑格尔的去世为起点而以第一次世界大战的爆发为终点，20世纪则是作为世界大战的时代而开始的。"
- "And yet, over against the whole of our civilization that is founded on modern science, we must ask repeatedly if something has not been omitted. If the presuppositions of these possibilities for knowing and making remain half in the dark, cannot the result be that the hand applying this knowledge wi"
- "The hermeneutical question ... is not restructed to the areas from which I began in my own investigations. My only concern there was to secure a theoretical basis that would enable us to deal with the basic factor of contemporary culture, namely, science and its industrial, technological untilizatio"
- "Understanding is language-bound. But this assertion does not lead us into any kind of linguistic relativism. ... While we live wholly within a language, the fact that we do so does not constitute linguistic relativism because there is absolutely no captivity within a language - not even within our n"
- "Precisely through our finitude, the particularity of our being, which is evident even in the variety of languages, the infinite dialogue is opened in the direction of the truth that we are."
- "Language occurs once again, in vocabulary and grammar as always, and never without the inner infinity of the dialogue that is in progress between every speaker and his partner. That is the fundamental dimension of hermeneutics."
- "Habermas ... asserts that if hermeneutical reflection were simply satisfied with general considerations, such as that nobody is able to reach beyond the limitedness of his own standpoint, then it would be ineffectual. ... What is the good, after all, Habermas asks, of knowing merely that a projected"
- "My thesis is ... that the thing which hermeneutics teaches us is to see through the dogmatism of asserting an opposition and separation between the ongoing, natural "tradition" and the reflective appropriation of it. For behind this assertion stands a dogmatic objectivism ... In this objectivism the"
Z-Library
收藏