捍卫历史

[英国] 理查德·J. 埃文斯

出版时间

2009-02-01

ISBN

9787563378852

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍
这不是一本让人心平气和的史学概论。它带着火气而来:面对后现代主义将一切历史降格为「文本」与「话语」、乃至否认大屠杀的极端论调,作者以「捍卫」为旗帜正面应战。打动读者的,恰是这种不妥协的姿态——在尽受思潮洗礼之后,既不退回天真的实证主义,也不向虚无缴械,而是主张:只要史家足够审慎,客观的历史知识仍可被获得。书中对「证据」与「事实」的辨析尤为锋利:一条描述人物体貌的记录,何以不能直接推出「他是昏庸的总统」,作者层层拆解,让人看见所谓「事实」往往只是「暂定的」。它适合那些被后现代论说搅得困惑、又拒绝就此放弃真相的读者;若指望系统梳理后现代各流派,则需另寻补。
作者简介
理查德-艾文斯(Richard J.Evans),当代杰出的历史学家,剑桥大学近现代史钦定讲座教授。著作等身,曾获多种奖项与奖励。在迄今为止他出版的近二十本著作中,影响最大的书当属Deathin Hamburg:SocietyandPolitics the Choler a Yearsl830-1910(Oxford,1987),InHitler's Shadow:WestGermanHistorians andtheAttempttoEscapefrom the NaziPast(New York,1989),Rituals ofRetribution(Oxford,1996),Talesfrom the German Underworld(New Haven and London,1998),The ThirdReich in Powerl933-1939(London and NewYork,2005)等。 著作详细目录 The Feminist Movement In Germany, 1894–1933, London: Sage Publications, 1976. "German Women and the Triumph of Hitler," The Journal of Modern History Vol. 48, No. 1, March 1976 The Feminists: Women's Emancipation Movements in Europe, America and Australasia, 1840–1920, London: C. Helm, 1977. Society And Politics In Wilhelmine Germany edited by R. J. Evans, London: Croom Helm, 1980, 1978. Review article: "The History of European Women: A Critical Survey of Recent Research," The Journal of Modern History Vol. 52, No. 4, December 1980 The German Family: Essays on the Social History of The Family in Nineteenth and Twentieth-Century Germany, London: C. Helm ; Totowa, N. J.: Barnes & Noble Books, 1981. The German Working Class, 1888–1933: The Politics Of Everyday Life, London: Croom Helm ; Totowa, N. J.: Barnes & Noble, 1982. The German Peasantry: Conflict And Community in Rural Society from the Eighteenth to the Twentieth Centuries edited by Richard J. Evans and W. R. Lee, London: Croom Helm, 1986. The German Unemployed: Experiences And Consequences Of Mass Unemployment From The Weimar Republic To The Third Reich, London: C. Helm, 1987. Rethinking German History: Nineteenth-Century Germany And The Origins Of The Third Reich, London: Allen and Unwin, 1987. Comrades And Sisters: Feminism, Socialism, And Pacifism In Europe, 1870–1945, Brighton, Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books; New York: St. Martin's Press, 1987. "The New Nationalism and the Old History: Perspectives on the West German Historikerstreit," The Journal of Modern History, Volume 59, No. 4, December 1987, pages 761–97 Death In Hamburg: Society And Politics In The Cholera Years, 1830–1910 Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987. The German Underworld: Deviants And Outcasts In German history, London: Routledge, 1988. In Hitler's Shadow: West German Historians And The Attempt To Escape From The Nazi Past, London: I. B. Tauris, 1989, ISBN 1-85043-146-9. Proletarians And Politics: Socialism, Protest, And The Working Class In Germany Before The First World War, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990. The German Bourgeoisie: Essays On The Social History Of The German Middle Class From The Late Eighteenth To The Early Twentieth Century London: Routledge, 1991. Rituals Of Retribution: Capital Punishment In Germany 1600–1987, New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. Rereading German History: From Unification To Reunification, 1800–1996, London; New York: Routledge, 1997. Tales From The German Underworld: Crime And Punishment In The Nineteenth Century, New Haven [Conn.]; London: Yale University Press, 1998. In Defense of History, New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1999. Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust, And The David Irving Trial, New York: Basic Books, 2001; published in the United Kingdom as Telling Lies About Hitler: The Holocaust, History and the David Irving Trial, Verso Books, 2002. The Coming Of The Third Reich, London: Allen Lane, 2003. The Third Reich In Power, 1933–1939, New York: Penguin, 2005. The Third Reich at War: How the Nazis Led Germany from Conquest to Disaster , London: Allen Lane, 2008. Cosmopolitan Islanders: British Historians and The European Continent, Cambridge University Press, 2009
AI导读
核心看点
  • 本书系统梳理19至20世纪史学史,批判性反思卡尔、艾尔顿等现代主义史学理论,深入剖析材料、证据、因果关系及客观性等核心概念的意义演变,旨在有理有据地反击激进后现代主义对历史学客观性的解构与攻击。
  • 作者强调历史学作为经验主义学科的本质,主张在严谨考证基础上,客观的历史知识是可以期望且能够获得的。同时,作者并非盲目排斥后现代主义,而是指出其批判中蕴含的有益反思,倡导将其合理成分融入当下的历史研究实践中。
  • 书中通过大量实际研究案例与学术论战,揭露后现代主义史学中虚无主义流毒,如否认大屠杀等极端观点。作者以严谨学术态度捍卫历史学的合法性,拒绝将历史视为纯粹的话语建构,坚持历史研究必须基于真实证据与事实核查。
读者共识
  • 读者普遍认可作者捍卫历史客观性的立场,认为本书有力回击了历史虚无主义与后现代主义的极端解构。许多读者表示,书中关于大屠杀否认等案例的批判令人警醒,强化了他们对历史研究必须基于事实、拒绝话语霸权的信念。
  • 部分读者指出书中对后现代主义流派的梳理不够系统,反击逻辑存在瑕疵,认为其建立在沙基之上。同时,有读者批评译者用词不当或存在误译,建议对照台译本或原文阅读。但多数读者仍肯定其学术价值与翻译的整体质量。
  • 读者认为本书理论深度较高,非专业人士阅读存在障碍,建议仅阅读导论、核心章节及跋。但同时也赞赏作者将理论反思与实证研究结合的能力,认为其折中立场有助于纠正学界将经验与理论对立的偏见,具有重要的方法论启示意义。
精彩摘录
  • "But in truth, ever since the early nineteenth century, one of the main purposes of historians has been to find the strange in the familiar, to increase the distance between ourselves and the past."
  • "Typically, what British empiricists admired in Namier was the thoroughness of his scholarship; they more or less ignored his Freudianism as an embarrassing but excusable Continental heresy."
  • "No doubt Knowles was right to argue that historians should not engage in explicit moral judgments on the past, an argument which was convenient indeed for him as a Catholic monk dealing with English monasticism in the 15th and early 16th centuries, when monks and nuns alike had been widely condemned"
  • "As three American historians have recently pointed out in their reflections on the current state of the debate, "History is much more than a branch of letters to be judged only in terms of its literary merit." If it were so judged, of course, it would generally found wanting. [...] Most history book"
  • "They likelihood of the gingerbread salesman's unfortunate death being a historical fact in this sense is moderately but not overwhelmingly high [...] It is for this reason, I think, not because it has not been widely quoted elsewhere (except in discussions of Carr's What's History?) that the status "
  • "Here Munslow seems to use "evidence" in the sense of "sources". Elsewhere he cites a well-known history of America which states that President James Madison was "Small of stature... light of weight...bald of head, and weak of voice." The implication is that he was a weak president (though why this s"
  • "His view is shared by William H. McNeill, of the University of Chicago, who used the occasion of his presidential address to the American Historical Association in 1986 to castigate his colleagues for practicing a "historiography that aspires to get closer and closer to the documents - all the docum"
  • "Footnotes and bibliographical references really are designed to enable the reader to check the sources on which a historian's statement is made and to see whether or not they support it. They are not mere rhetorical designed to produce a spurious "reality effect.""
目录
导论
第一章 史学史
第二章 历史学、科学与道德
第三章 史家及其事实
第四章 材料和话语

显示全部
用户评论
把Britain's Open University翻译成"英国广播电视大学”真的合适吗?页9。。
作者很彪悍
1认得每一个中文字还是读不懂 2不理解这本书的意义。这本书论述的结论,和徐国富“灌输”的一模一样...
西方史学界八卦集成
在经受后现代思潮洗礼之后,作者仍能保持“捍卫”姿态同时不失吸收教训和自我反思,这是不容易的。写得流畅,译得也好,对19-20世纪史学史的梳理和书后所列的进阶阅读书目很有帮助。
之前读前几章,印象很好,段子很多。后面几章略无聊。有意思的是看了跋,发现我想吐槽的别人都吐槽过了。作为一本1997年出版的著作,作者的目光似乎只停留在英语学界,引用最多的竟然还是卡尔和艾克顿。而这类议题早在八十年代的法国就已经被讨论的非常详尽了。在不理解对方理论的情况下试图折衷,结果就表现出一种绵软无力,反驳的确实都是一些庸俗的三流观点,在实际中也没产生太大冲击。对后现代主义的理解无论正面还是负面都相当肤浅。他能接受的部分是对一些历史学议题的扩充,不能接受的是一种极端的相对主义,但难道所有极端的相对主义都要高举后现代主义的旗帜吗?哪怕仅仅在历史层面,对后现代主义的理解都有偏差,最可笑的就是将权力理解为机械的谁拳头大谁有理。
代标History of the founding of a nation I.文章聚焦在抗美援朝背景下,以巩固新民主主义革命成果为目标,四场在建国初期互相穿插的政治运动成因、过程和结果分析
说到后现代主义对历史的全盘否认,自己在理论上就存在明显谬误,用错误的立论来进行反驳,简直不可理喻。历史是客观存在的,而且在互相作证和动机确认后,历史是不容歪曲的。
译者故作古雅。
包容的。
下载
收藏