Justice for Hedgehogs - Ronald Dworkin, [美国] 罗纳德·德沃金

Justice for Hedgehogs

Ronald Dworkin, [美国] 罗纳德·德沃金

出版社

Belknap Press

出版时间

2011-01-11

ISBN

9780674046719

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍
The fox knows many things, the Greeks said, but the hedgehog knows one big thing. In his most comprehensive work Ronald Dworkin argues that value in all its forms is one big thing: that what truth is, life means, morality requires, and justice demands are different aspects of the same large question. He develops original theories on a great variety of issues very rarely considered in the same book: moral skepticism, literary, artistic, and historical interpretation, free will, ancient moral theory, being good and living well, liberty, equality, and law among many other topics. What we think about any one of these must stand up, eventually, to any argument we find compelling about the rest. Skepticism in all its forms—philosophical, cynical, or post-modern—threatens that unity. The Galilean revolution once made the theological world of value safe for science. But the new republic gradually became a new empire: the modern philosophers inflated the methods of physics into a totalitarian theory of everything. They invaded and occupied all the honorifics—reality, truth, fact, ground, meaning, knowledge, and being—and dictated the terms on which other bodies of thought might aspire to them, and skepticism has been the inevitable result. We need a new revolution. We must make the world of science safe for value.
AI导读
核心看点
  • 主张价值一元论,真理、道德与正义同源
  • 以尊严为核心,整合理想生活与道德责任
  • 批判怀疑论,构建解释型道德哲学体系
适合谁读
  • 政治哲学、法理学与伦理学专业研究者
  • 对德沃金法律帝国理论有深入兴趣者
  • 具备哲学基础,能接受高密度抽象思维者
读前提醒
  • 前半部方法论论证晦涩,需耐心啃读
  • 建议结合伯林刺猬狐狸隐喻理解主旨
  • 后半部政治主张精彩,可重点阅读
读者共识
  • 德沃金巅峰之作,体系宏大且逻辑严密
  • 文笔极具修辞魅力,但部分论证显跳跃
  • 阅读门槛极高,非专业读者易感吃力

本导读基于书籍简介、目录、原文摘录、短评和书评生成,不等同于全文精读。

精彩摘录
  • "Some speech-act skeptics insist that the close connection between moral judgments and motives I mentioned earlier shows that moral judgments cannot be beliefs, and so cannot be true or false, because beliefs cannot provide motives by themselves. I may believe that aspirin will relieve my pain, but i"
  • "然而,假设政府做出完全相反的选择:不论人们做出何种选择,财富都均等。就像大富翁游游戏那样,每隔几年,政府收回每个人的财富进行等额再分配。这是对个人生活自主责任的不尊重,因为他们的任何选择一不论是选择工作还是退休,不论是选择储蓄还是投资一一都不会对他们个人产生任何影响。"
  • "只有当一个共同体至少有了某种初步的孟德斯鸠,描述的权力分立之后,我们才可以合理地将法律权利与其他政治权利区分开来。"
用户评论
德老认为我们无法逃避道德,最根本地是因为选择做何事总是需要理由。然而正如 Richard Joyce 在此十年前便指出的,这恰恰说明无法逃脱的是实践理性,而不是普遍的道德。可惜,德老只提及了后者一次,未触及此一关键点。虽然他老也承认道德怀疑论目前在元伦理学界已做稳了主流。
重读了内在怀疑论和interpretation部分的内容。
那天看《法理学》里头Morrison专门提到德沃金的修辞力,想想真是如此。很多比喻乍看不可思议,再看就发现真是不可思议。
形而上学、认识论、真之理论……各个方面的基础都还不够。先停一停。
豆瓣M的第1000本,德翁最佳,超五星杰作。道德truth的存在和解释型特征,然后以尊严为基础从ethics到morality到political morality到law整全结构。德翁真刺(guo)猬(jing)!
因此,法律也是一种grounds,我们在此基础之上提出一种可以被courts执行的权利主张,这样的实践本身处在更大的political value network之中。
我同意
想知道什么是重要之事。把阅读和自己真正关切的事情结合起来。/7.15看过一遍,还没有细读。/8.20这一遍读下来对德翁的目标和论证细节有了更清楚的认识,但是第4、5、8章还是有很多不理解的地方。读完第八章最后几节之后应该开始动手写,厘清自己为什么不理解这些论证。确定命题和论证,学习实践技艺。/1号钻探平台。11.1/第一次模仿德翁的进路写作以失败告终。在DDL之前交了半成稿。看看德翁写的,再看看我自己写的。只有一句评价,“咳,什么垃圾玩意!”。11.9写下了第一句,至少我开始写了。愿德翁佑我!12.15/暂时放一下吧,感谢德瓮。
真的没人觉得写的有点啰嗦么……
收藏