书籍介绍
这本书最耐人寻味的地方，或许不在它讲清了哪些哲学家，而在它反复追问一件事：'欧陆哲学'这个名分，究竟是真的思想分野，还是一个被历史建构出来的标签？作者身为英美大学里讲授欧陆哲学的学者，却用分析哲学式的清晰去拆解这场分野，本身就带着反讽意味。读者反复提到的'前轮驱动 vs 日本车'之喻、'拉屎时读'的轻松感、'一口气读完'的畅快，都指向同一件事：它不把你摁在'深奥'的高地上，而是让你看清那些本该严肃的话题如何被分类、被辩护、被赋予价值。它适合对'哲学该如何划分'这一元问题感到好奇的人——与其说它教你欧陆哲学，不如说它让你重新审视'我们为何这样看待哲学'。
AI导读
核心看点
- 厘清欧陆与分析哲学的虚假对立
- 追溯康德解读差异导致的分野
- 弥合知识与智慧的现代裂痕
读者共识
- 语言风趣幽默，阅读轻松
- 逻辑清晰，极具启发性
- 适合碎片时间阅读的闲书
精彩摘录
- "自然的去魅 disenchantment of nature"
- "黑格尔将有关认知的生死之争看做是升华为绝对认知的重要部分；尼采论述上帝之死和对价值重估的需求；卡尔 马克思论述人类在资本主义条件下的异化和追求解放和公正的社会变革的需求；弗洛伊德论述在梦境、玩笑、口误中表现的无意识的压抑以及它所揭示出的精神生活核心的非理性；海德格尔论焦虑、非真实社会生活中的麻木冷漠以及对真实存在的需要；萨特论述自欺、憎恶以及渴望人类自由的无用但却必须的激情；阿尔伯特 加缪论述在上帝之死造成的荒谬宇宙中的自杀问题；伊曼纽尔 列维拉斯 论述我们队他人的无限责任的创伤…… Examples are legion here，whether one thinks of Hegel on"
- "Thus, to put it rather grandly, the problem of philosophical modernity, as presented so far, is how to confront the problem of nihilism after one has seen how the values of Enlightenment not only fail to get a grip on everyday life, but lead instead to its progressive dissolution. (86)"
- "...if the early Wittgenstein was held captive by a picture of language reducible to logic that enabled one to say what could be said while passing over the remainder in silence, then the later Wittgenstein sought to escape this picture by analysing ordinarily language usage. (108)"
- "Philosophy must be clearly argued conceptual creation in critical relation to given traditions of thinking, and not a melancholic mourning for missed opportunities or a mere technique for sharpening one's common sense."
- "The appeal of much that goes under the name of Continental philosophy, in my view, is that it attempts to unify or at least move closer together questions of knowledge and wisdom, of philosophical truth and existential meaning. Examples are legion here, whether one thinks of Hegel on the life and de"
- "Much of the difference between analytic and Continental philosophy simply turns on how one reads Kant and how much Kant one reads. That is, whether one is solely preoccupied with the epistemological issues of the First Critique or Critique of Pure Reason (1781), or by the greater systematic ambition"
- "For Hamann, in another uncanny prediction of later philosophical developments, namely the linguistic turn, the separation between reason and experience, or form and content, is impossible because thought depends on language, which is, of course, a mixture of both. Where exactly do you draw the disti"
下载
收藏