Retromania - Simon Reynolds

Retromania

Simon Reynolds

出版时间

2011-07-19

ISBN

9780865479944

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

We live in a pop age gone loco for retro and crazy for commemoration. Band re-formations and reunion tours, expanded reissues of classic albums and outtake-crammed box sets, remakes and sequels, tribute albums and mash-ups . . . But what happens when we run out of past? Are we heading toward a sort of culturalecological catastrophe where the archival stream of pop history has been exhausted? Simon Reynolds, one of the finest music writers of his generation, argues that we have indeed reached a tipping point, and that although earlier eras had their own obsessions with antiquity—the Renaissance with its admiration for Roman and Greek classicism, the Gothic movement’s invocations of medievalism—never has there been a society so obsessed with the cultural artifacts of its own immediate past. Retromania is the first book to examine the retro industry and ask the question: Is this retromania a death knell for any originality and distinctiveness of our own?

Simon Reynolds is a music critic whose writing has appeared in The New York Times, The Village Voice, Spin, Rolling Stone, and Artforum. He is the author of five previous books, including Rip It Up and Start Again.

用户评论
Dj shadow有次在唱片店地下室翻黑胶,结果在一张黑胶底下翻到一具蝙蝠的尸体,喔喔喔,这故事也太哥特了吧!全书所选的角度不错,切题还算深入,有时候会吊吊书袋,吊完书袋后也总会用乐坛八卦中和一下。对上个十年的总结极为精准,youtube,ipod等媒介的风头盖过任何音乐。算是本年度音乐类好书一枚,推荐一下吧。春节再细读。
最后一部分高潮迭起,读得越来越high。全书通篇没有提到post-rock这个词,后来一看索引也没有,哈哈哈哈哈....
作者梳理了20世纪流行音乐及其影响,看这本的主要目的也是看复古未来主义,不过他提到的年轻人对过去文化的追捧也来源于这些文化兴盛时自己的缺席,这点很独特
盛名之下,其实难副。整本书给人两个印象:浮泛和混乱。“复古狂热”这个点固然抓得很准(至少有启发性,对不对是另一回事),但相应的论述和分析则缺乏足够的深度,多数时候仅仅是在描述文化现象,用起理论来如蜻蜓点水般点到为止,即使偶有洞见,也早就淹没在了八卦和资料的层层堆砌之中。雷诺兹的写作,高情商叫“高潮迭起”,低情商叫“混乱不堪”。(说实话,我没能通读全书,只挑了看上去感兴趣的篇章过了一遍。整整五百页啊!太痛苦了……)不过,雷诺兹至少很诚实,即使冒着被扣上“历史终结论”这顶大帽子的风险,也不愿意背叛自己的内心深处对复古的痴迷之情。作为文化批评家的“雷诺兹”,自始至终都在同作为资深乐迷的“西蒙”作斗争。正所谓:小时候嘲笑复古,长大后理解复古,成熟后痴迷复古。
Mark Fisher们不过是阿多诺音乐观的周期性回归。换个角度看,对过去延长线上的“进步”观的拒绝本身可以是“反复古”的,对欧洲白男精英视角下的“现代”式单线进化的无限要求反而是僵化“复古”的体现。作者假定所有人对“旧”事物的获取都是基于同样的情感诉求,死守自己对乐史的定义权,相当于一种对解读思路的命令,也相当于拒绝为更多不同背景的人开放历史“重写”的空间。档案整体的素材化和对去时间差异化的毫不介怀,正是非同一群体/代际重新理解乐史、打破僵化逻辑、找到新方向的重要前提。换了运转逻辑的“新”东西当然在涌现,只是仍在期待过往表面化的、简化了的对世界架构和对权力关系的认识能够持续生效的“旧”视线不愿直视罢了。(多年后作者自己也说自己当年判断错误,没死的东西多了去了)
本来想写篇长评的 但是写着写着就变成我自己的Retromania,跟自己说着新年不想当nerd了,结果新年第一天凌晨六点读完music nerd写的书,正好是纽约时间凌晨,再见。
理性难以掩盖火热的激情,公允的同时又不得不进行价值判断。让人反思,甚至有些动摇,就说明这是一本了不起的书
收藏