The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1

Jürgen Habermas, [德国] 尤尔根·哈贝马斯

出版社

Beacon Press

出版时间

1985-03-01

ISBN

9780807015070

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍
这并非一本让人读得轻松的书,却也是一本让人读完后难以忽视的书。它最核心的野心,是把「理性」从抽象的哲学概念拉回到日常语言之中:我们之所以能彼此协调行动,靠的不是算计得失,而是语言里内嵌的、对「有效性主张」的相互承认——一个言说之所以成立,是因为说话者能为它提供理由,听者也能用理由予以证成或批评。以此为支点,作者区分了「交往行为」与「策略行为」,并试图构建一种以交往理性为基础的批判型社会理论。读者反馈两极:有人视其为「最后一座宏大的系统」,也有人抱怨它「像拥抱一具干尸」。它真正适合的人,或许不是寻求现成答案者,而是愿意在「大问题与小细节之间」反复权衡、追问社会秩序如何可能的人。
AI导读
核心看点
  • 系统整合哈贝马斯三十年理论思考
  • 区分交往行为与策略性行为
  • 批判20世纪哲学与社会学主流
读者共识
  • 理论体系宏大,是当代社会理论基石
  • 阅读难度极大,被喻为拥抱干尸
  • 中译本质量参差,强烈建议对照英译
精彩摘录
  • "A pluralistic mode of critical inquiry suggests a different norm of correctness: that criticism must be verified by those participating in the practice and that this demand for practical verification is part of the process of inquiry itself In the absence of any such general theories, the most fruit"
  • "The fundamental form of coordination through language......a practical stance......reading understanding...... COMMUNICATIVE ACTION, which he distinguishes from strategic forms of social action......speakers coordinate their action and pursuit of individual (or joint) goals on the basis of a shared "
  • "we understand a speech act when we know the kinds of reasons that a speaker could provide in order to convince a hearer that he is entitled in the given circumstances to claim validity for his utterance--in short, when we know what makes it acceptable"
  • "speech acts inherently involve claims that are in need of reasons--claims that are open to both criticism and justification"
  • "fact-stating modes of discourse......claims to moral rightness, ethical goodness or autheticity, personal sincerity, and aesthetic value......a richer social idea--that a claim (statement) merits the addressee's acceptance because it is justified or true in some sense, which can vary according to th"
  • "moves the analysis beyond a narrow focus on the truth-conditional semantics of representation to the social intellibility of interaction"
  • "allowing for weaker forms of communicative action (in which not all three types of validity claims are at stake) or strategic action (in which actors understand that everyone is oriented toward individual success)"
  • "shared cultural systems of meaning, institutional orders that stablize patterns of action, and personality structures acquired in family, church, neighborhood, and school"
用户评论
继阿伦特之后,又发现了一位滔滔不绝的主儿。。
叹服。读的感觉就是看着哈贝马斯用维特根斯坦的锤子在韦伯密不透风的墙上凿了个洞。仍然不是很确信这套理论在是否在实践上有建设性贡献。需要抽空把第二卷也看完吧。
为论文,读完三个形式世界和四种社会行为分类这一部分。论文写完有时间,再通读全书。另,有英文译本,曹卫东译本可以丢开了,实在没法读
阅读此书犹如拥抱一具干尸,没有生命力。最后一部分谈法兰克福学派的很有激情,英译也是行云流水。
近年大家都開始踩他、批評他,我不反對他對很多人的閱讀和批評都是不準確的(但試問學術界又有多少人敢說自己肯定是準確的?其實個個都認為自己是!)但我覺得有很多地方他仍是正確的,而且也有重要的見地和建樹!他很可能會是最後一位有這麼龐大系統的宏大論述式理論家了。不要繞過他便走進所謂的「後現代」,也不要忽視他對詮釋學的貢獻。
我的是唐山書店翻印,羅永生舊藏。
感觉读了好久,但起码没跨年😂。但打开第二册的勇气却还没找到……
据说自从读了哈贝马斯,康德的作品都算不上难度了....
下载
收藏