Aporias

Jacques Derrida

出版时间

1993-12-01

ISBN

9780804722520

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍
"My death—is it possible?" That is the question asked, explored, and analyzed in Jacques Derrida's new book. "Is my death possible?" How is this question to be understood? How and by whom can it be asked, can it be quoted, can it be an appropriate question, and can it be asked in the appropriate moment, the moment of "my death"? One of the aporetic experiences touched upon in this seminal essay is the impossible, yet unavoidable experience that "my death" can never subject to an experience that would be properly mine, that I can have, and account for, yet that there is, at the same time, nothing closer to me and more properly mine than "my death." This book bears a special significance because in it Derrida focuses on an issue that has informed the whole of his work up to the present. For the last thirty years, Derrida has repeatedly, in various contexts and various ways, broached the question of aporia. Making it his central concern here Derrida stakes out a new frontier, at which the debate with his work must take place from now on: the debate about the aporia between singularity and generality, about the national, linguistic, and cultural specificity of experience and the trans-national, trans-cultural law that protects this specificity of experience and of the necessity to continue working in the tradition of critique and of the idea of critique, yet the corresponding necessity to transcend it without compromising it; the aporetical obligation to host the foreigner and the alien and yet to respect him, her, or it as foreign. The foreign or the foreigner has always been considered a figure of death, and death a figure of the foreign. How this figure has been treated in the analytic of death in Heidegger's Being in Time is explored by Derrida in analytical tour de force that will not fail to set new standards for the discussion of Heidegger and for dealing with philosophical texts, with their limits and their aporias. The detailed discussion of the theoretical presuppositions of recent cultural histories of death (Ariès, for example) and of psychological theorizations of death (including Freud's) broaden the scope of Derrida's investigation and indicate the impact of the aporia of "my death" for any possible theory.
精彩摘录
  • "It is necessary, therefore, that the decision and responsibility for it be taken, interrupting the relation to any presentable determination but still maintaining a present able relation to the interruption and to what it interrupts"
  • "If one wants to translate this situation in terms of disciplinary or regional borders, of do mains of knowledge, then one will say that the delimitation of the fields of anthropological, historical, biological, demographic, and even theological knowledge presupposes a nonregional onto phenomenology "
  • "What I mean here is an entirely other "logic" of the order: if there are legitimate and powerful questions about the foundation and the "already" of the condition of possibility, then they are themselves made possible and necessary by a relation to death, by a "life-death" that no longer falls under"
用户评论
a difficult 'must-read' for an intertextual reading, with Agamben's The Open, of the 'problematic closure' of animality
以海德格尔对死亡的conception为例讨论语言和知识的边界;以及没有了神学的超验结构&目击了种种概念和实体间不可化约性之后,世俗化的人类社会应该如何沟通差异。一切aporias都是人类在不可能的可能性/可能性的不可能性的怪圈里走来走去。从地理和文化边界开始的哲学问题最后又回到了政治问题。这本书里阿甘本还是非常后现代。
德里达从论述海德格尔出发,到解构海德格尔为止,但其实在独一性问题上,德里达还是继承了海氏的观点。在这本书中,死亡终于与延异(自我即他者)问题联系起来,很令人振奋。
下载
收藏