书籍介绍
理查德·罗兹（Rjchard Rhodes），美国作家、记者、历史学家，出生于美国堪萨斯城，毕业于耶鲁大学。他写过十几本非虚构类的书，对核武器历史的关注是其中最引人瞩目的主题，也让他大获成功。继《原子弹秘电》之后，他还写了《黑太阳：氢弹秘史》、《愚蠢的兵工厂：核武器军备竞赛秘电》，可以说是他的“核武器秘史三部曲”。这三本书都让他赢得了数不清的读者，也赢得了“普利策奖”等应接不暇的荣誉。他关于纳粹杀人机器盖世太保特别行动队的编年史《死亡之主》，以及关于朊病毒与疯牛病、库鲁病等的书《致命的盛宴》，讲述的依然是杀戮的故事。另外，他还菩有《地球之子》、《神圣的秘密》等小说。
AI导读
核心看点
- 本书获普利策奖，详尽记录核物理发展史及曼哈顿计划全过程。从早期理论突破到原子弹制造，再到广岛长崎爆炸，全景式展现科学、政治与社会演变，是迄今最详细的原子弹工程史著作，揭示人类如何因巨大野心与智慧走向毁灭边缘。
- 深入刻画奥本海默、费米、玻尔等顶尖科学家的群像与命运。书中不仅讲述技术细节，更揭示科学家间的竞争、合作、哲学思考及道德困境。展现天才们在战争阴影下的挣扎，以及他们如何被卷入改变人类命运的历史洪流，令人深思。
- 深刻反思科技与伦理、战争与和平的复杂关系。作者以冷静笔触描绘核爆惨状，批判将灾难视为‘报应’的狭隘观点。强调原子弹带来的不仅是军事胜利，更是长期核威慑与全球性威胁，警示后人科技双刃剑的残酷现实。
适合谁读
- 对二战历史、核物理发展史及曼哈顿计划感兴趣的读者。本书提供权威、详实的一手资料与深度分析，满足对这段关键历史时期求知欲，帮助理解现代国际关系与核威慑体系的起源，适合历史爱好者与研究者。
- 关注科学家传记、科技伦理及人文精神的读者。书中大量篇幅描写科学家个人经历、思想斗争与社会责任，展现他们在极端环境下的选择与后果，引发对科技滥用、战争罪行及人类命运的深刻反思，适合人文社科爱好者。
- 受《奥本海默》电影启发，希望深入了解背景与真实历史的观众。本书提供远超电影的信息量与深度，还原复杂历史全貌，纠正片面认知，适合希望从影视延伸阅读、追求真实历史细节与严肃思考的读者。
读前提醒
- 本书篇幅巨大，信息密集，涉及大量物理概念与历史人物。建议耐心阅读，勿因前期理论部分枯燥而放弃。若仅关注原子弹制造，可跳过早期核物理发展章节，但会损失对科学家背景与动机的理解，影响对全书深度的把握。
- 书中对广岛、长崎核爆惨状的描写极为真实残酷，可能引发强烈心理不适。读者需做好心理准备，理解作者旨在揭示战争恐怖而非渲染暴力。建议结合历史背景理性阅读，避免情绪化解读，聚焦于对和平与科技伦理的思考。
- 涉及众多科学家与政治人物，关系复杂。建议阅读时注意梳理人物脉络，可利用书中注释或外部资料辅助理解。作者非物理专业出身，但叙事严谨，侧重历史与社会影响，读者应关注其历史批判与人文关怀，而非单纯技术细节。
读者共识
- 公认本书为核武器历史研究的巅峰之作，获普利策奖实至名归。读者普遍赞誉其史料详实、叙事宏大、文笔优美，虽篇幅冗长但价值极高。认为其不仅记录历史，更深刻反思人类命运，是理解现代世界不可或缺的经典，值得反复研读。
- 读者对书中科学家群像描写印象深刻，认为其展现了天才的辉煌与悲情。同时，对核爆惨状的描写引发强烈震撼与反思，多数读者认为这绝非‘报应’，而是人类共同悲剧。强调科技无善恶，关键在于使用者，呼吁和平与理性。
- 部分读者反映阅读过程艰难，因内容过于沉重、信息量过大而中途放弃。但坚持读完者均表示收获巨大，认为其超越普通科普或历史书，具有史诗般的深度与广度。建议读者调整预期，将其作为严肃历史文献而非消遣读物对待。
本导读基于书籍简介、目录、原文摘录、短评和书评生成，不等同于全文精读。
精彩摘录
- "Ludwig Mies van der Rohe designed his first glass-walled skyscraper in postwar Berlin, Yehudi Menuhin made his precocious debut, with Einstein in the audience to applaud him. George Grosz sorted among his years of savage observation on Berlin's wide boulevards and published Ecce Homo. Vladimir Nabok"
- "In the summer of 1922 the rate of exchange in Germany sank to 400 marks to the dollar. It fell to 7,000 to the dollar at the beginning of January 1923, the truly terrible year. One hundred sixty thousand in July. One million in August and 4.2 trillion marks to the dollar on November 23, 1923, when a"
- "He was convinced in the mid-1920s chat "the parliamentary form of democracy would not have a very long life in Germany" but he "thought that it might survive one or two generations." Within five years he understood otherwise. I reached the conclusion something would go wrong in Germany in 1930.” Hja"
- "Michael Polanyi, a chemist at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes with a family to consider-viewed the German political scene optimistically, like many others in Germany at the time. They all thought that civilized Germans would not stand for anything really rough happening, "Szilard held no such sanguine"
- "Adolf Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany on January 30, 1933. On the night of February 27 a Nazi gang directed by the head of the Berlin SA, Hitler's private army, set fire to the imposing chambers of the Reichstag. The building was totally destroyed. Hitler blamed the arson onthe Communists"
- "Psychometricians have closely questioned American scientists of this first modern generation (1920s), curious to know what kind of men they were-there were few women among them-and from what backgrounds they emerged. Small liberal arts colleges in the Middle West and on the Pacific coast, one study "
- "Oppenheimer arrived (in Berkeley) in a battered gray Chrysler in the late summer of 1929 from another holiday... He put up at the faculty club and the two opposite numbers, he and Lawrence, became close friends. Oppenheimer saw unbelievable vitality and love of life" in Lawrence. "Work all day, run "
- "composite portrait of the American scientist in his prime: "He is likely to have been a sickly child or to have lost a parent at an early age. He has a very high I.Q. and in boy hood began to do a great deal of reading. He tended to feel lonely and"different and to be shy and aloof from his classmat"
用户评论
不仅仅是众生相 更是对未来之路的摸索。。
如果前面的激动人心都是为了最后广岛的命运 那人类也太悲哀了 愿世界上多一些波尔
好多年前读过，家里有一本。具体内容不记得，但1920～30年代物理学的突破以及科学家之间的竞争特别让人印象深刻。
迄今最详细的曼哈顿工程史
读的上册。20世纪上半叶物理学的发展和科学家的集体传记.以放射现象为主线讲述核物理的发展
下载
收藏