Anachronic Renaissance - Alexander Nagel

Anachronic Renaissance

Alexander Nagel

出版社

Zone Books

出版时间

2010-04-30

ISBN

9781935408024

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

In this widely anticipated book, two leading contemporary art historians offer a subtle and profound reconsideration of the problem of time in the Renaissance. Alexander Nagel and Christopher Wood examine the meanings, uses, and effects of chronologies, models of temporality, and notions of originality and repetition in Renaissance images and artifacts. Anachronic Renaissance reveals a web of paths traveled by works and artists--a landscape obscured by art history's disciplinary compulsion to anchor its data securely in time. The buildings, paintings, drawings, prints, sculptures, and medals discussed were shaped by concerns about authenticity, about reference to prestigious origins and precedents, and about the implications of transposition from one medium to another. Byzantine icons taken to be Early Christian antiquities, the acheiropoieton (or "image made without hands"), the activities of spoliation and citation, differing approaches to art restoration, legends about movable buildings, and forgeries and pastiches: all of these emerge as basic conceptual structures of Renaissance art. Although a work of art does bear witness to the moment of its fabrication, Nagel and Wood argue that it is equally important to understand its temporal instability: how it points away from that moment, backward to a remote ancestral origin, to a prior artifact or image, even to an origin outside of time, in divinity. This book is not the story about the Renaissance, nor is it just a story. It imagines the infrastructure of many possible stories.

用户评论
文艺复兴时期同时出现了复制前人的作品以及标榜创新的作品,探讨艺术品所指向的多重时间。从个头来说又是一件凶器,这个学期的最后一本书了。美貌与智慧兼备的教授生病了啊,课间咳嗽得厉害
目前我喜欢的艺术史写作,要么作者活在美国,要么埋在英国,t t
Renaissance Orientations. Spring 2012. w/ Alexander Nagel.
妈呀,上学期最大新收获是一本小说,这学期最大新收获是一本文艺复兴书。能读到这样的书这学就没白念
图书馆request等了大半年的书。开头非常不错,但是越到后来越觉得哪里不太对劲。总体来说低于预期。友邻说主要是Wood急于理论建构的问题。我觉得最别扭的地方则是这本著作试图通过大量纳入各种(有些很有可能并不适合)实例来达到理论建构的目的这个思路本身还是problematic,并非这种做法本身错误而是它看似广阔但实际上相当狭窄。错时性是蛮重要的主题,也应该有很多探讨的空间,但是个人还是更喜欢Bynum这样的学者思路,以清晰的thesis和分析为起点进行深度挖掘和稳步推进。感觉这本书里也反映出了很多美国学界很多问题,大概就是那种很努力要弄出一些很了不起的东西的企图 and its manifested ambitions for such reasons
盛名之下,其实难副。体例散乱,不成体统,大大弱化了开篇立下的理论野心。要说最重要的贡献嘛,大概就在于引领了“错时论”(anachronism)这个新的“学术增长点”(笑)。缩略版本:Alexander Nagel and Christopher S. Wood, "Toward a New Model of Renaissance Anachronism", in The Art Bulletin, Vol. 87, No. 3 (Sep., 2005), pp. 403-415.
一本理论野心和理论excess兼备的新名著。稍微泼点冷水吧。所谓“替换”和“表演”这两种范式的碰撞和交替本质上是对贝尔廷“图像时代”和“艺术时代”从时间性层面上的再演绎,两位作者对贝尔廷和Stoichita有关这两个时代之间断裂的论断做了细分,用文艺复兴时期来探究两种范式的互动和交织,但一些个案分析未免理论先行,我不确定每个案例都是用这两个概念来解释最恰当。同时有关替换链和anachronic的论述个人感觉是对Kubler时间的形状和Gell能动性的某种结合,所谓一件作品能抓取未来就是一种作品在形式序列中自主开放的时间能动性。这种错时论虽然对打开单一脉络中的时间谱系很有好处,却不见得有利于处理多线条的时间性和更复杂文化间的空间地理关系。Kubler和Gell的参照系反而更开放。
上课作业翻译,随着同学翻译一起过了一遍
"The identity of the object is maintained by the stability of its name and the tacit substitution of its parts."
收藏