Sexual Hegemony - Christopher Chitty

Sexual Hegemony

Christopher Chitty

出版时间

2020-08-01

ISBN

9781478008675

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

In Sexual Hegemony Christopher Chitty traces the five-hundred year history of capitalist sexual relations by excavating the class dynamics of the bourgeoisie's attempts to regulate homosexuality. Tracking the politicization of male homosexuality in Renaissance Florence, Amsterdam, Paris, and London between the seventeenth and nineteenth centuries, as well as twentieth-century New York City, Chitty shows how sexuality became a crucial dimension of the accumulation of capital and a technique of bourgeois rule. Whether policing male sodomy during the Medici rule in Florence or accusing the French aristocracy of monstrous sexuality in the wake of the French Revolution, the bourgeoisie weaponized both sexual constraint and sexual freedom in order to produce and control a reliable and regimented labor class and subordinate it to civil society and the state. Only by grasping sexuality as a field of social contention and the site of class conflict, Chitty contends, can we embark on a politics that destroys sexuality as a tool and an effect of power and open a front against the forces that keep us unfree.

Christopher Chitty (1983–2015) was a PhD candidate in the History of Consciousness at the University of California, Santa Cruz.

Max Fox is an editor of Pinko magazine, a former editor of the New Inquiry, and translator of The Amphitheater of the Dead.

Christopher Nealon is Caroline Donovan Professor of English at Johns Hopkins University and author of Foundlings: Lesbian and Ga...

(展开全部)

目录
Foreword / Max Fox vii
Introduction / Christopher Nealon 1
Part I: Sexual Hegemonies of Historical Capitalism
1. Homosexuality and Capitalism 21
2. Sodomy and the Government of Cities 42

显示全部
用户评论
用的是葛兰西的"cultural hegemony",试图以资本主义的“world system”将福柯的"history of sexuality"还原为"history of property",分析非常欧洲中心,但这种缺陷也可以被读作留白——留给第三世界学者大片的理论空间——虽然路径本身有赖于更多Asia/Africa/Latin America in Global History的史学作品出现。但其实读完感觉好像也一般般吧,对于Sodomy作为一种Act(与Gay Identity对应)的历史化夹杂着七七八八的东西,各种同性社交和亲密关系,但回溯的具体意义,在课上和同学也没讨论清楚。另外,作品是作者友人将他的遗作整理而出版的历史作品,展现出多种queer temporalities.
读了historicising the history of sexuality,并没有太看懂,等待明天reading group获得一些insights(
收藏