A. P. Martinich’s best-selling text, Philosophical Writing: An Introduction, has garnered high praise for its ability to help students with little or no experience in philosophy craft a well-written philosophical essay while learning to think analytically and gaining confidence in their essay-writing skills. This substantially updated new edition features a new chapter on how to read a philosophical essay, along with new sections on rhetoric in philosophical writing, and quantification and modality. Fresh essay examples have also been added, providing the reader with concrete examples of all the stages that go into creating a successful philosophy essay. The new edition offers a companion website where students can easily access additional examples and expanded coverage of other helpful topics relating to philosophical writing. Written with clarity and wit and offering invaluable guidance, Philosophical Writing: An Introduction, 4th Edition, is an essential resource for all philosophy students.
A. P. Martinich is Roy Allison Vaughan Centennial Professor in Philosophy and Professor of History and Government at the University of Texas at Austin. His publications include The Two Gods of Leviathan (1992) and Hobbes: A Biography (1999); and, as co-editor, A Companion to Analytic Philosophy (Blackwell, 2001), Analytic Philosophy, 2nd ed. (Wiley Blackwell, 2012), and The Phi...
- 本书严格界定分析哲学写作规范，强调清晰、有序、结构严谨的表达是追求真理的唯一路径。作者明确反对故弄玄虚的晦涩文风，指出思想深邃者必求清晰，伪深刻者才求模糊，旨在纠正学生常见的逻辑混乱与表达冗余问题。
- 提供标准化的哲学论文结构模板，强制要求开篇即陈述核心论点，随后严格遵循论证有效性验证与前提真实性检验的步骤。书中详细拆解如何构建有效论证，确保前提能逻辑必然地推导出结论，杜绝无效推理。
- 传授具体的写作心理建设与操作技巧，如通过概念笔记克服写作障碍，严禁以‘做研究’为借口拖延动笔。同时指导如何平衡直觉与理论，倡导反思平衡立场，并规范第一人称的使用边界，确保学术客观性。
- 哲学专业初学者及需要撰写哲学课程论文的学生。本书专为缺乏哲学写作经验者设计，提供从零开始构建合规学术文章的详细指南，帮助读者掌握分析哲学的基本论证规范与逻辑训练方法，规避常见学术错误。
- 希望提升学术写作逻辑严密性与表达清晰度的非哲学专业研究者。书中关于论证结构、前提验证、逻辑谬误规避及清晰表达的原则，适用于所有需要撰写严谨论证性文章的社科人文领域学习者。
- 对分析哲学方法论感兴趣，或希望了解西方学术规范与批判性思维训练机制的读者。通过本书可深入理解分析哲学对语言精确性、逻辑有效性的极致追求，以及其背后所蕴含的诚实、尊重读者的学术伦理。
- 请勿将本书视为文学创作指南，它不关注修辞优美或情感表达，而是纯粹的工具性规范手册。读者需摒弃对‘深刻晦涩’的误解，接受清晰直白才是哲学写作最高准则的理念，严格遵循其结构要求。
- 书中部分逻辑定义与论证规则较为枯燥且重复，建议结合具体写作任务进行针对性阅读。若已具备一定逻辑学基础，可快速跳过基础定义部分，重点参考论文结构模板与错误案例分析章节。
- 务必警惕书中强调的‘拖延陷阱’，不要以‘准备不足’为由推迟写作。读者应模仿书中的分阶段写作建议，先完成粗糙初稿再修改，同时注意区分‘说服教授’与‘展示理解’的本质差异，避免过度迎合。
- 读者普遍认可本书在纠正学术写作陋习方面的价值，认为其提供的结构模板极具操作性。尽管部分用户反馈内容啰嗦或例子琐碎，但多数观点认为这种‘啰嗦’体现了作者对学生困境的共情与严谨负责的教学态度。
- 强烈共识认为清晰性是哲学写作的核心美德，任何试图通过模糊语言掩盖思想贫瘠的做法都应被摒弃。读者赞赏作者对‘伪深刻’文风的批判，认为这有助于打破对哲学神秘化的刻板印象，回归理性与诚实。
- 多数读者表示相见恨晚，认为若能在学术训练初期接触此书，可避免大量无效努力。尽管部分高阶读者认为内容基础，但作为规范手册仍具参考价值，尤其对于需要反复查阅论证格式与逻辑规则的学生而言是必备工具书。
本导读基于书籍简介、目录、原文摘录、短评和书评生成，不等同于全文精读。
- "The Structure of a Philosophical Essay A Simple One I State the proposition to be proved. II Give the argument for that proposition. III Show that the argument is valid. IV Show that the premises are true. V State the upshot of what has been proven."
- "With this technique, you begin by stating in one sentence the thesis or main point of your essay. In trying to formulate that one sentence, you should not be concerned with what your audience might need as background information and you needn’t be shy of using technical terms. The required backgroun"
- "First, it forestalls writer’s block, which is often caused either by the fear that one has nothing to say or the fear that what one has to say is wrong. The second purpose of conceptual note taking is to provide you with materials to be organized and evaluated in preparation for writing a good first"
- "Doing research keeps you from writing, and starting to write is typically the hardest thing to do; delaying the start seems most attractive to people. Further, research can inhibit your writing. In short, don’t delay; write first; footnote later."
- "The structure and style of a student’s essay should be the same as an essay of straightforward exposition and explanation. All technical terms have to be explained as if the audience knew little or no philosophy. This means that the student ought to explain them by using ordinary words in their ordi"
- "Although physical courage is widely admired and discussed in contemporary society, and, perhaps, unwittingly caricatured in macho men, intellectual courage is not. Too few people have the courage of their convictions; yet convictions on important issues that are the result of investigation and refle"
- "Promoting only intuition or only theory are extreme positions. There is a middle ground between them that promotes what may be called reflective equilibrium. This view holds that philosophy should begin with intuitions; that theorizing should begin by trying to explain those intuitions; that when in"
- "Df(1) An argument is a sequence of two or more propositions of which one is designated as the conclusion and all the others of which are premises. Df(2) A sound argument is an argument which is valid and which contains only true premises. Df(3) An argument is valid if and only if it is necessary tha"
Qabbalah The philosophical writings of Solomon ben Yehudah Ibn Gebirol, or Avicebron
The Philosophical Writings of Descartes
Bank 4.0
Word 2019 For Dummies
Strategy Beyond the Hockey Stick
Project Management
Unmasking the Social Engineer
The Essays of Warren Buffett (4/e)