Animacies - Mel Y. Chen

Animacies

Mel Y. Chen

出版时间

2012-07-09

ISBN

9780822352723

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

In Animacies, Mel Y. Chen draws on recent debates about sexuality, race, and affect to examine how matter that is considered insensate, immobile, or deathly, animates cultural lives. Toward that end, Chen investigates the blurry division between the living and the dead, or that which is beyond the human or animal. Within the field of linguistics, animacy has been described variously as a quality of agency, awareness, mobility, sentience, or liveness. Chen turns to cognitive linguistics to stress how language habitually differentiates the animate and the inanimate. Expanding this construct, Chen argues that animacy undergirds much that is pressing and indeed volatile in contemporary culture, from animal rights debates to biosecurity concerns. Chen's book is the first to bring the concept of animacy together with queer of color scholarship, critical animal studies, and disability theory. Through analyses of dehumanizing insults, the meanings of queerness, animal protagonists in recent Asian/American art and film, the lead toy panic in 2007, and the social lives of environmental illness, Animacies illuminates a hierarchical politics infused by race, sexuality, and ability. In this groundbreaking book, Chen rethinks the criteria governing agency and receptivity, health and toxicity, productivity and stillness - and demonstrates how attention to the affective charge of matter challenges commonsense orderings of the world.

Mel Y. Chen is Assistant Professor of Gender and Women's Studies at the University of California, Berkeley.

目录
Acknowledgments
Introduction: Animating Animacy
Part I * Words
1. Language and Mattering Humans
2. Queer Animation

显示全部
用户评论
致谢写出花了。全书用认知语言学里的“生命度等级”概念勾连酷儿、种族、非人转向,重读福柯的治理术、奥斯汀的言语行为理论等。此书对词类的讨论主要是在英语的框架里,作者也直接将其与西方本体论传统关联。前阵子看到明年AAS有人在组panel讨论亚洲语境里的酷儿语言学。
竟然是lakoff的学生,Berkeley总有奇妙的组合
在new materialism的框架里读的,但是作者是语言学和文化研究背景,分析的例子基本都是representation和symbol,mediated materiality。作者的涉猎范围很奇妙。开头以为会是跟“气”有关的,结果作者真的是在完全西方的理论脉络里。
a interesting way of articulating matter, body and mind;
A Wonderful Must-Read. And the question continues: how does AI fit into this framework?
Language. Language!
对福柯biopolitics的一种延展,undo the life-death binary,intersectional到有点让人眼花缭乱的地步_(:_」∠)_
冲着queer animality那章去的 失望了 但是没想到最后讲lead metal的这么惊艳 思考lead作为passive matter如何在话语中被animated to produce racial discourse 最棒的是他写african为什么被asian代替的那一段 哇 厉害 这个一定要读
Z-Library
收藏