Superstitious Regimes

Rebecca Nedostup

出版时间

2010-04-01

ISBN

9780674035997

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

We live in a world shaped by secularism - the separation of numinous power from political authority and religion from the political, social, and economic realms of public life. Not only has progress toward modernity often been equated with secularization, but when religion is admitted into modernity, it has been distinguished from superstition. That such ideas are continually contested does not undercut their extraordinary influence. These divisions underpin this investigation of the role of religion in the construction of modernity and political power during the Nanjing Decade (1927-1937) of Nationalist rule in China. This book explores the modern recategorization of religious practices and people and examines how state power affected the religious lives and physical order of local communities. It also looks at how politicians conceived of their own ritual role in an era when authority was meant to derive from popular sovereignty. The claims of secular nationalism and mobilizational politics prompted the Nationalists to conceive of the world of religious association as a dangerous realm of 'superstition' that would destroy the nation. This is the first 'superstitious regime' of the book's title. It also convinced them that national feeling and faith in the party-state would replace those ties - the second 'superstitious regime'.

Rebecca Nedostup is Associate Professor of History at Boston College.

作者简介
Rebecca Nedostup is Associate Professor of History at Boston College.
用户评论
读得太累了。作者太炫耀英文词汇量了,频繁使用高端罕见词汇。但其实遣词造句和行文章法并不是太精湛,读起来不畅快。至于学术价值,那就不用说了。十年磨一剑,档案功夫十分了得。赞!
民国江苏
我觉得也就是三星吧,材料是挺翔实,但是论述实在是混乱啊。
每次讀都有新的發現。secular modernity - nationalism to replace religion - 持續爭議
intro+conclusion+chapter 6 "living embodiments of superstitions", blind fortune-tellers和90年代的“迷信专业户”,既是政权的“敌人”(迷信)又是需要保护的公民(citizenship)
在第二三章,作者描绘了虽然孙中山提出了宗教自由的主张,但是如何把宗教团体纳入民族主义现代国家之内是一件困难的事。作者详述了各种史料细节,读起来有些繁琐。
“迷信”这个概念已经如此浸透到我们的认知中,以致于它作为规定性的范畴的运作方式常常被忽略。而对概念的形成和概念间的交错做历史研究,某种程度上讲,就是让简单的“事实”复杂化的过程。 听说作者曾长期在中国做文献解读和田野调查,读起来深感背后的工夫扎实,今日仍是对近代中国佛教研究最为详实和精细的书之一。最后讲public life一段稍有点乱,但读完也能感觉到这个视角极大的可能性(日本的近代宗教-国家研究这一块还较缺乏)。
kmt对于宗教的清洗使得宗教成为各种力量角逐的中间领域
导论很不错
收藏