Inside the White Cube - Brian O'Doherty

Inside the White Cube

Brian O'Doherty

出版时间

2000-01-14

ISBN

9780520220409

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

When these essays first appeared in "Artforum" in 1976, their impact was immediate. They were discussed, annotated, cited, collected, and translated - the three issues of "Artforum" in which they appeared have become nearly impossible to obtain. Having Brian O'Doherty's provocative essays available again is a signal event for the art world. This edition also includes "The Gallery as Gesture," a critically important piece published ten years after the others. O'Doherty was the first to explicitly confront a particular crisis in postwar art as he sought to examine the assumptions on which the modern commercial and museum gallery was based. Concerned with the complex and sophisticated relationship between economics, social context, and aesthetics as represented in the contested space of the art gallery, he raises the question of how artists must construe their work in relation to the gallery space and system. These essays are essential reading for anyone interested in the history and issues of postwar art in Europe and the United States. Teeming with ideas, relentless in their pursuit of contradiction and paradox, they exhibit both the understanding of the artist (Patrick Ireland) and the precision of the scholar.

用户评论
temple white cube
艺术作用的改变,使得政治活动家经常表达了对画廊和它所代表的商业体系的不满
Where am I supposed to stand? This question doesn't only ask people where they should stand spatially in the gallery, but also ask people how their perceptions of the art work are changed by the gallery space. Gallery space starts to have influence on one’s perception and becomes reflective of modernism, being the content rather than the context. M
薄薄一本小书,论点很有启发性,但对不熟悉现当代艺术史的读者也实在是不友好。White Cube作为当代艺术的陈设、展览空间,最大限度地把艺术品与外部世界隔离开,阻断了时间的流逝,让艺术品的陈列空间具有了教堂和墓穴宗教般的神圣特质。在modernism的语境下,context成为了content,画廊不再是被动地承载艺术品的场所,“the object introduced into the gallery 'frames' the gallery and its laws”。对此艺术家也没有放弃对空间的干预,Duchamp的Mile of String让无数丝线布满画廊的空间,使其成为观众无法涉足的所在,Klein则直接用垃圾填满画廊。对架上绘画“边缘”的探讨、观者与艺术品的关系没太读懂。
@2019-01-24 15:48:15
前三章都挺引起思考的,喜欢第一章。第四章的gesture概念我还是觉得蛮晦涩..读不懂5555 / 杜尚的“Mile of String” at “First Papers of Surrealism”很有意思———艺术家的装置setup是否自动变为策展? installation和exhibition之间的距离 / gallery———永恒的、排他的、一个审美单位的心理容器
当这些文章于 1976 年首次出现在“艺术论坛”时,它们的影响是立竿见影的。它们被讨论、注释、引用、收集和翻译——它们出现的三期“艺术论坛”几乎不可能获得。让布赖恩·奥多尔蒂 (Brian O'Doherty) 的挑衅性文章再次可用是艺术界的一个信号事件。这个版本还包括“作为手势的画廊”,这是一篇比其他版本晚十年出版的极其重要的作品。奥多尔蒂是第一个明确面对战后艺术特定危机的人,因为他试图研究现代商业和博物馆画廊所基于的假设。考虑到经济、社会背景和美学之间复杂而复杂的关系,在艺术画廊的竞争空间中表现出来,他提出了艺术家必须如何根据画廊空间和系统来解释他们的作品的问题。
①奥多尔蒂的两副面孔:艺术家和艺术批评家。艺术家的身份给了他侵略性强的写作风格,艺术批评家的身份则给了他不错的思辨能力和理论素养。两者结合起来,便造就了奥多尔蒂的魅力:既能犀利无情地揭人脸皮插人心脏,又能沉下心来爬梳艺术史和艺术理论的谱系,整个读起来就像是有逻辑的爽文。②但有理由怀疑,奥多尔蒂没能好好研读格林伯格的《现代主义绘画》。奥多尔蒂指控现代主义绘画的反错觉主义:若说颜料和画布的实体性已使绝对的平面性无法成立,那么鼓吹平面性则恰恰是错觉主义的残余。但格林伯格早就说过,现代主义绘画的平面性绝非绝对的平面性,因而绝非彻底的反错觉主义,而是用表面游走的视觉错觉取代深入其中的触觉错觉,这一点弗雷德在《艺术与物性》中讲得更加清楚。可以说,奥多尔蒂将现代主义绘画的原理教条化了。
收藏