Nudge

Richard H. Thaler

出版时间

2008-04-08

ISBN

9780300122237

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍
这本书最独特的地方,在于它不要求人变成理性经济人,而是承认我们本就是会偷懒、会从众、会损失厌恶的普通人,并据此重新设计做选择的环境。它提出一种看似矛盾的姿态:既坚持自由——不禁止任何选项、不强行改变激励,又相信可以通过巧妙的'选择架构'引导人们做出对自己更好的决定,即'自由意志的专制主义'。读者最津津乐道的,正是这种'既放手又引导'的微妙平衡:它尊重你选错的自由,却悄悄帮你少犯错。它适合那些既不愿被说教、又渴望少交学费的人;也适合关心制度设计者——从器官捐献率到退休储蓄,细节往往决定成败。
作者简介
Richard H. Thaler, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences in 2017 for his pioneering work in the fields of behavioral economics and finance, is the Charles R. Walgreen Distinguished Service Professor of Behavioral Science and Economics at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, where he is the director of the Center for Decision Research. He is also the co-director (with Robert Shiller) of the Behavioral Economics Project at the National Bureau of Economic Research and the 2015 President of the American Economic Association. He has been published in several prominent journals and is the author of a number of books, including Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. Cass R. Sunstein specializes in constitutional law, regulatory policy, and economic analysis of law. He is by far the most cited law professor in the United States. He has also written for many popular newspapers and magazines, including The New York Times, The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, The Boston Globe, Chicago Tribune, The American Prospect, Time, Harper’s Magazine, and New Republic. He has also appeared on many national television and radio shows, including Nightline, Fox News, ABC World News, NBC Nightly News, 20/20, NewsHour, The O’Reilly Factor, and Fresh Air. Sunstein graduated in 1975 from Harvard College and in 1978 from Harvard Law School, magna cum laude. He clerked for Justice Thurgood Marshall of the U.S. Supreme Court. Before joining the faculty of the University of Chicago Law School, he worked as an attorney-advisor in the Office of Legal Counsel of the U.S. Department of Justice. Mr. Sunstein is the author of many articles and a number of books, including Republic.com (2001), Risk and Reason (2002), The Cost-Benefit State (2002), Why Societies Need Dissent (2003), The Second Bill of Rights (2004), Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle (2005), and Worst-Case Scenarios (2007).
AI导读
核心看点
  • 提出自由家长主义,温和引导决策
  • 揭示人类认知偏差与非理性行为
  • 设计选择架构以优化公共政策
读者共识
  • 视角独特,颠覆传统理性人假设
  • 案例丰富有趣,但部分观点略显杂乱
  • 实用性强,启发思考生活中的选择
精彩摘录
  • "因此,在许多领域,人们都倾向于认为结果是完全可以预测的,并且音乐家、演员或者作家的成功与他们的能力和人格魅力是分不开的。对于这一倾向,我们要多加小心,关键时刻一些很小的干预甚至是巧合,都会对最终结果产生深远的影响。那些当红歌星们很可能与其他成百上千名有同样才华的艺人在演出水平上并没有太大的区别,但我们却连那些人的名字都叫不上来。"
  • "“损失厌恶”容易使人产生惰性,即一种强烈的保持现状的欲望。如果你因为不想招致损失而不愿意放弃某些事情,你便会拒绝因此发生的交易。在另外一个实验中,一个班里的一半学生得到了咖啡杯,而另一半学生得到的是一大块巧克力。咖啡杯和巧克力的价钱大体相当,因此在得到这两样东西之前,同学们表现出了对二者基本相等的占有欲望。然而,一且他们拿到了各自的东西,当我们再次要求他们将手中的东西换成另外一种时,仅有10%的人愿意这样做。 因此,我们看出,“损失厌恶”的作用实际上是一种认知助推它竭力阻止我们改变现有的状况,即便这些改变对我们非常有益。"
  • "别被自我想象中的聚光灯照花了眼! 你应当这样想:实际上他们并没有自己所想的那样关注自己。"
  • "As we shall see, small and apparently insignificant details can have major impacts on people's behavior. A good rule of thumb is to assume that "everything matters."
  • "A nudge, as we will use the term, is any aspect of the choice architecture that alters people’s behavior in a predictable way without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives."
  • "To qualify as Econs, people are not required to make perfect forecasts (that would require omniscience), but they are required to make unbiased forecasts. That is, the forecasts can be wrong, but they can’t be systematically wrong in a predictable direction. Unlike Econs, Humans predictably err."
  • "Again, biases can creep in when similarity and frequency diverge. The most famous demonstration of such biases involves the case of a hypothetical woman named Linda. In this experiment, subjects were told the following: “Linda is thirty-one years old, single, outspoken, and very bright. She majored "
  • "Mere measurement effect: when people are asked what they intend to do, they become more likely to act in accordance with their answers."
目录
Nudge Acknowledgments
Introduction
Part I: Humans and Econs
1. Biases and Blunders
2. Resisting Temptation

显示全部
用户评论
20200508 like a flywheel
Too wide as the coverage is, the books fails to include more in-depth cost-benefit analysis.
之前拜读Thaler论文时就深深为他的洞察力折服,如今读他写的科普书真更别提多有趣啦!十分推荐!P.S. 成功收入俺的论文麾下☺️
读不下去了。涉及很多美国医保、贷款等现状和政策看得我一头雾水。这本书是写给decision architect的。至于我这种困惑青年,先认清楚自己吧
Interesting! keyword "Libertarian Paternalism" as one of the "third ways"--maintain and even improve the agents' freedom to choose while institutions designing the schemes toward a direction that "manipulates"/makes agents' lives longer, healthier, and better. Relevance: "not for bigger gov, but for better governance"
基本是从行为经济学角度来引导“如何做更好的选择”。不过其实还是以政府公共政策领域为主的,也有一些社会心理学的研究结合。最喜欢的居然是反讽婚姻制度部分。。
Push yourself to be the big elephant who nudges rather than the small one nudged by other irrationals #getAbstract#
自己的研究领域 libertarian paternalism // 作者举例的时候分别有调侃到康奈尔和罗马尼亚 感觉有被双倍冒犯 lol
A nudge is any aspects of the choice architecture that alters people‘s behavior in a predictable way without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives.to count as a mere nudge,the intervention must be easy and cheap to avoid.libertarian parternalism is a relatively weak,soft,and nonintrusive type of parternalism .
Thaler是俺最喜欢、最敬重的经济学家之一~
下载
收藏