Architecture and Utopia

Manfredo Tafuri

出版社

The MIT Press

出版时间

1979-10-02

ISBN

9780262700207

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍
这不是一本教人如何建造乌托邦的书,而是一部冷静宣告乌托邦'死亡'的解剖报告。塔夫里最锋利之处,在于他拒绝让建筑承担救世使命:从花园城市到包豪斯,从苏联先锋到纽伦堡,所有试图以规划重塑社会的尝试,最终都被收编进资本的逻辑,成为其运转的齿轮。他逼读者承认一个 uncomfortable 的事实——建筑师越是'理性',越是在替资本主义打工。书中最具争议的判断,正是'救赎不在反抗,而在无差别地成为全球机器中的一个零件'。适合那些不愿被建筑浪漫话术安抚、想看清设计背后资本运作的读者;若你期待一本鼓励'用建筑改变世界'的励志手册,这里只有冷水。
作者简介
Manfredo Tafuri is the Director of the Department of History of Architecture at the Istituto Universitario di Architettura in Venice.
精彩摘录
  • "(a) a first, which witnesses the formation of urban ideology as an overcoming of late romantic mythology (b) a second, which sees the task of the artistic avant-garde develop as the creation of ideological projects and the individualization of "unsatisfied needs," which are then consigned for concre"
  • "De Stijl and the Bauhaus introduced the ideology of the plan into a design method that was always closely related to the city as a productive structure. Dada, by means of the absurd, demonstrated - without naming it - the necessity of a plan. Furthermore, all the avant-garde movements adopted politi"
用户评论
18世纪建筑师参与先锋运动后,德国与荷兰的建筑师率先使用工业化生产和预制构建,但不论是Ernst May的New Frankfurt还是Hilberseimer与密斯合作的Weissenhof,都只是运用标准化住宅设计的居住区,在塔夫里看来,实质上却是反都市化进程的民主主义乌托邦。而另一部分,以霍华德的田园城市和赖特的广亩城市为代表的无政府主义者,明确提出城市解体的田园乌托邦,也被看作因缺乏面对城市化进程勇气的懦弱者的强烈怀旧情感表达。没有任何一种乌托邦设想可以解决大都市所面临的不确定性,多功能型,多样性和城市结构的更新问题
it's a truth. it's a delusion. for "those who search into the very bowels of reality in order to know and assimilate its values and wretchedness; and those who desire to go beyond reality, who want to construct ex novo new realities, new values, and new public symbols"
。。。。
In this book, Manfredo Tafuri traces how the capitalist development affected architectural ideologies and practices from the late 18th century to the 1960s. He tries to manifest the historic causes that lead to the irrelevance of architectural ideology today.
gift from poiuny :) read in flight in 6hrs. v nice. partly diminish the gap I've been re/searching from Terragni to Eisenman to contemporary urbanistic theory. that absolute typological thesis vs. those programmatic pragmatic theses.
好难,很难算读过,只能知道主线在讲什么,不能知道每个例子的逻辑。
读得快死了QAQ
看的我云里雾里,读懂非懂
socialist角度下的的资本与建筑,看到后面简直绝望
購於柏林:“Salvation lies no longer in ‘revolt’, but in surrender without discretion.” 人性贖罪的唯一方式是作為全球機器中的一個齒輪來運作,原罪即是生為imperfect machine。所有反抗都已被反抗本身反噬。反而對modern art有了更深層的理解。
下载
收藏