The Social Construction of Technological Systems - Wiebe E. Bijker (ed.)

The Social Construction of Technological Systems

Wiebe E. Bijker (ed.)

出版社

The MIT Press

出版时间

1989-03-05

ISBN

9780262521376

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

The impact of technology on society is clear and unmistakable. The influence of society on technology is more subtle. The 13 essays in this book draw on a wide array of case studies from cooking stoves to missile systems, from 15th­century Portugal to today's AI labs - to outline an original research program based on a synthesis of ideas from the social studies of science and the history of technology. Together they affirm the need for a study of technology that gives equal weight to technical, social, economic, and political questions.

Professor of Technology and Society at the University of Maastricht. He is the author of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change (MIT Press, 1997) and other books.

Thomas P. Hughes is Professor of the History and Sociology of Science at the University of Pennsylvania.

Trevor Pinch is Professor of Science and Technology Studies and Professor of S...

(展开全部)

用户评论
STS入门读物,大牛论文集,详述了social constructivist, technological systems, actor network三种STS研究角度,从用sociology研究科技到研究科技就是在研究sociology本身,一个理论闭环完成。
这本书很好看。比如解释为什么自行车是现在这个样子,而不是另一个样子。就是“有千条路可走,为何你偏偏走上了这条”。
课本,社会建构理论必读。
The very famous "school bus book"...STS 出圈之作(大雾
三种视角(社会建构论、技术史及ANT)对四大节(Common theme (指seamless web of technology), Complexity(一些中间概念),Strategic Research Sites(制定方法,主要内容),and something new(技术自身的发展,两篇都把AI作为topic))问题的讨论。著名的自行车在I节第一篇。
STS在技术研究方向上最早的探讨性论文集,各章分别探讨sociotechnical system、SCOT和ANT三种理论方法的应用。因为三种理论方法在文集出版时尚在草创(system稍微早一些),有许多探索性和不够完备的内容,所以本书做入门教材的同时也是做critical reading,感受STS技术研究领域发展的好材料。可配合另一本Bijker和Law主编的Shaping Technology/Building Society食用
一篇不差地读完了。优点:看着几位作者互相驳斥观点还挺乐的&收录了STS几乎所有的观点(social constructionism, actor-network theory等)缺点:几乎每篇的引入部分都有些冗长,感觉是STS文章的通病。综合:作为入门书兼顾深度与广度,但每篇不同的focus有些让人劝退。
正在读 但已经能感觉到那种严谨,认真的态度。但因为是很早的作品,视角其实已经被现在的学者内化,所以并不是很新鲜。 补:清晰简洁 用起来的担心在于现在会不会过时 对比之下还是更喜欢技术社会学 技术哲学总感觉不够有趣
收藏