Mind and Cosmos - Thomas Nagel

Mind and Cosmos

Thomas Nagel

出版时间

2012-09-26

ISBN

9780199919758

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍
In Mind and Cosmos Thomas Nagel argues that the widely accepted world view of materialist naturalism is untenable. The mind-body problem cannot be confined to the relation between animal minds and animal bodies. If materialism cannot accommodate consciousness and other mind-related aspects of reality, then we must abandon a purely materialist understanding of nature in general, extending to biology, evolutionary theory, and cosmology. Since minds are features of biological systems that have developed through evolution, the standard materialist version of evolutionary biology is fundamentally incomplete. And the cosmological history that led to the origin of life and the coming into existence of the conditions for evolution cannot be a merely materialist history. An adequate conception of nature would have to explain the appearance in the universe of materially irreducible conscious minds, as such. No such explanation is available, and the physical sciences, including molecular biology, cannot be expected to provide one. The book explores these problems through a general treatment of the obstacles to reductionism, with more specific application to the phenomena of consciousness, cognition, and value. The conclusion is that physics cannot be the theory of everything.
精彩摘录
  • "The view that rational intelligibility is at the root of the natural order makes me, in a broad sense, an idealist—not a subjective idealist, since it doesn’t amount to the claim that all reality is ultimately appearance—but an objective idealist in the tradition of Plato and perhaps also of certain"
用户评论
Assuming — which of course cannot safely be assumed — that there is but one universe. But Deresiewicz knows as a fact that what he can perceive with his particular sensory configuration is “all there is.”
很多人对他提出了那个修饰过的目的论持批评态度,情有可缘。对我而言,更亲近的是那或隐或显的万物有灵论的想法。论证的要紧处,出现的有关直觉和常识的探讨,让人想到陈嘉映的某些观点。
全篇总是在流露quasi-Kantian的影子,但是似乎一句康德都没提2333333
“荒谬是我们身上最人性化的东西之一:是人类最先进、有趣特性的体现。因此,与其因缺乏存在意义而心烦意乱,倒不如以戏谑之心而非英雄主义或绝望来度过荒谬的人生。” 这种戏谑,我想就是当你在家中到处找手机,最后却发现它一直在口袋里时发出的一声轻笑。同样地,我们喜欢通过超前审视个体存在来寻找生命的意义,而没有意识到意义一直与我们同在。
打起来,打起来
难道“心灵哲学”就是philosophy of mind么那真是我了个大槽= =……还有为毛常用标签里面会有“护教”= =…… / Nagel虽然竭力避免背上Platonism的metaphysical luggage,但是(好吧我觉得肯定是因为我没有看懂)我真的不明白他如果强调value最终是"independent",那要如何看待value的come into being与生命的进化正好同步(因为natural order的inclination)?而且更关键是为何前者会作用于后者?(还是因为natural order的inclination??)
收藏