Why Look at Animals?

John Berger

出版社

Penguin

出版时间

2009-08-27

ISBN

9780141043975

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

John Berger broke new ground with his penetrating writings on life, art and how we see the world around us. Here he explores how the ancient relationship between man and nature has been broken in the modern consumer age, with the animals that used to be at the centre of our existence now marginalized and reduced to spectacle. Throughout history, some books have changed the world. They have transformed the way we see ourselves - and each other. They have inspired debate, dissent, war and revolution. They have enlightened, outraged, provoked and comforted. They have enriched lives - and destroyed them. Now Penguin brings you the works of the great thinkers, pioneers, radicals and visionaries whose ideas shook civilization and helped make us who we are.

AI导读
核心看点
  • 本书深刻剖析了现代社会中人与动物关系的异化过程。伯格指出,在消费主义时代,动物从人类生活的中心被边缘化,沦为供人观赏的奇观或商品。书中批判了动物园、动物玩具及影像传播如何将动物去语境化,切断了人类与自然界真实、平等的联系,揭示了这种观看背后隐藏的权力不对等与殖民逻辑。
  • 作者通过对比前工业时代农民与土地、动物的共生关系,以及现代资产阶级将进食景观化的行为,揭露了阶级差异在对待生命态度上的本质区别。书中强调,将动物简化为孤立的生产或消费单元,与将人异化为经济单位的过程同源,警示读者反思现代文明对生命本真的剥夺与扭曲。
  • 作为约翰·伯格《看》系列的重要篇章,本书展现了其独特的散文美学与哲学深度。作者以诗意且充满悲悯的笔触,探讨观看之道、暴力与死亡等沉重议题。书中文字虚实交错,既是对视觉文化的批判,也是对人类灵魂起源的追问,引导读者在凝视动物时,重新审视自身的存在状态与道德责任。
适合谁读
  • 适合对视觉文化研究、批判理论及社会伦理感兴趣的读者。本书深入探讨了图像、媒体如何塑造我们对世界的认知,特别是关于动物被符号化、景观化的过程。希望提升批判性思维,理解现代消费社会中权力运作机制,以及反思自身观看习惯与道德立场的读者,将从中获得深刻的思想启发。
  • 适合约翰·伯格的书迷及人文社科爱好者。伯格以其独特的散文风格著称,将哲学思考融入日常观察,文字极具感染力。喜欢《观看之道》、《第七天》等作品的读者,会欣赏本书中对生命、死亡、暴力及人性阴暗面的细腻剖析。本书适合那些渴望在文学与哲学交叉领域寻找深度阅读体验,并关注动物权利议题的读者。
  • 适合关注生态伦理、反殖民主义及社会正义议题的读者。书中揭露了动物园作为殖民权力象征的历史,以及现代文明对自然生命的剥削逻辑。对于希望从历史和社会学角度理解人与自然关系破裂原因,并寻求在现代社会中重建与万物真实连接、反思人类中心主义的读者,本书提供了重要的理论视角与情感共鸣。
读前提醒
  • 本书为散文集,各篇章独立成篇但主题互相关联,阅读时需注意伯格独特的叙事策略。他常以个人经历或虚构场景切入,进而展开哲学与社会学批判。读者不应仅停留在故事表面,而应深入理解其背后的隐喻,如‘进食景观’对阶级暴力的揭示,以及‘动物凝视’缺失所象征的人性异化,避免误读其严肃的社会批判意图。
  • 建议结合伯格的其他著作如《观看之道》或《关于狗》一同阅读,以获得更完整的思想脉络。书中涉及的历史背景、殖民主义批判及马克思主义视角,需要读者具备一定的社会学与哲学基础。若对某些抽象概念感到困惑,可查阅相关背景资料,切勿因文字晦涩而放弃,其深层逻辑与情感力量值得反复咀嚼与深思。
  • 阅读过程中需警惕自身作为‘观看者’的立场。伯格旨在唤醒读者对动物苦难的感知,而非提供简单的解决方案。读者应反思自己在日常生活中对动物的态度,是否也参与了将其物化或景观化的过程。本书不提供廉价的安慰,而是要求读者直面现代文明的残酷真相,这种阅读体验可能带来不适,但却是通向真正伦理觉醒的必要路径。
读者共识
  • 读者普遍认为本书是约翰·伯格散文创作的巅峰之作,文字优美、思想深刻且极具震撼力。许多读者表示,书中关于动物被边缘化、被剥夺凝视权利的论述令人警醒,彻底改变了他们对动物园、动物影像及日常消费行为的看法。尽管部分篇章涉及暴力与死亡,但其悲悯情怀与哲学深度获得了广泛赞誉,被视为理解现代人性异化的重要文本。
  • 读者高度评价伯格将复杂的社会批判融入诗意叙述的能力,认为其写作风格独特且富有感染力。尽管有少数读者反映部分章节晦涩难懂或感到絮叨,但绝大多数读者认为其思想价值远超阅读门槛。书中对阶级差异、殖民历史及生命伦理的揭露,被认为具有强烈的现实批判意义,能够激发读者对自身生活方式及价值观的深刻反思与重构。
  • 读者共识认为,本书不仅是一本关于动物的书,更是一本关于人类自身处境的书。通过剖析人与动物关系的破裂,伯格揭示了现代文明中人际关系的冷漠与异化。读者普遍反映,阅读本书是一次痛苦但必要的精神洗礼,它促使人们重新审视‘观看’这一行为的伦理后果,并呼吁在现代社会中重建对生命的尊重与连接,具有极高的思想启蒙价值。

本导读基于书籍简介、目录、原文摘录、短评和书评生成,不等同于全文精读。

精彩摘录
  • "We live our daily lives in a constant exchange with the set of daily appearances surrounding us - often they. are very familiar, sometimes they are unexpected and new, but always they confirm us in our lives. They do so even when they are threatening: the sight of a house burning, for example, or a "
  • "...because animals remain ambiguous."
  • "Animals were seen in eight out of the twelve signs of the zodiac. Among the Greeks, the sign of each of the twelve hours of the day was an animal. (The first a cat, the last a crocodile.) The Hindus envisaged the earth being carried on the back of an elephant and the elephant on a tortoise. For the "
  • "Silesius's master was Eckardt, who, further down the Rhine beyond Strasbourg, in Cologne, wrote during the thirteenth century, 'God becomes God when the animals say: God.'"
  • "To the peasants all food represents work accomplished. The work may or may not have been his own or that of his family, but if it isn't, the work presented is nevertheless directly exchangeable with his own work. Because food represented physical work, the eater's body already 'knows' the food it is"
  • "This reduction of the animal, which has a theoretical as well as economic history, is part of the same process as that by which men have been reduced to isolated productive and consuming units. Indeed, during this period an approach to animals often prefigured an approach to man. The mechanical view"
  • "Likewise in the 19th century, public zoos were an endorsement of modern colonial power. The capturing of the animals was a symbolic representation of the conquest of all distant and exotic lands."
  • "Zoos, realistic animal toys and the widespread commercial diffusion of animal imagery, all began as animals started to be withdrawn from daily life. One could suppose that such innovations were compensatory. Yet in reality the innovations themselves belonged to the same remorseless movement as was d"
用户评论
一句话概括就是seeing is marginalizing. 迪斯尼的例子应该结合爱森斯坦看就更有趣了,动画里的现实主义动物。不过我脑子中一直转的问题是visibility is also a way of empowering... representation still matters.
有趣儿
非常诗意,写作标杆,英文水平一般都可以看得愉快 peasant和bourgeois的部分让我想到了前段时间看的尤哈尼的《思考之手》,想要有自然洞见力缺不了的东西:自然本身(乡村记忆)、悲悯。这点完全就和小布尔乔亚们区分开来了。
Opening a gate和Ape theatre最爱!将理性的思考用感知性的语言描述出来,有些情节虚实交错,思维域广而发散,大概就是我喜欢读Berger散文的原因了。另外,老先生写人与人之间的交往和人的际遇很让人动容。
so long
動物與人類;人類與動物;資產階級下的進食景觀⋯「Why look at animals」和「The eaters and the eaten」這兩篇讚讚 (2、8兩篇也喜歡) / John Berger真的行🥺 早在幾十年前就已經講出我的心聲,並以更加有邏輯、高度、哲學浪漫地表達ah!🥺🥲
好有意思的一本小书,值得反复看。
约翰·伯格是工薪阶层里极致浪漫不服输的代表,再平凡的事情在他笔下都变得值得书写了,最喜欢最后一篇与The eater and the eaten.
工业化后资本社会里动物的存在变成人类文明的附属品甚至消费品,可远古文明里的哲人和部落原住民看待动物从来都是本是同根生,即使生理差别大,语言无法交流,但相扶相持地生存下去才是the way to be
收藏