Chain of Title

David Dayen

出版社

The New Press

出版时间

2017-12-09

ISBN

9781620973509

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

The "gripping" (New York Times) and "Hitchcockian"(Publishers Weekly) story of how a nurse, a car dealership worker, and a forensic expert took on the nation’s largest banks

A Kirkus Reviews and The Week best book of the year, David Dayen’s Chain of Title is a riveting work that recalls A Civil Action, Erin Brockovich, and Flash Boys, recounting how three ordinary Floridians—a car dealership worker, a cancer nurse, and an insurance fraud specialist—helped uncover the largest consumer crime in American history, challenged the most powerful institutions in America, and—for a brief moment—brought the corrupt financial industry to its knees.

Lisa Epstein, Michael Redman, and Lynn Szymoniak did not work in government or law enforcement. They had no history of anticorporate activism. Instead they were all foreclosure victims, and while struggling with their shame and isolation they committed a revolutionary act: closely reading their mortgage documents, discovering the deceit behind them, and building a movement to expose it. Harnessing the power of the Internet, they revealed how the financial crisis and subsequent recession were fundamentally based upon a series of frauds that kicked millions out of their homes because of false evidence by mortgage companies that had no legal right to foreclose. As Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi noted: "Chain of Title is a sweeping work of investigative journalism that traces the arc of a criminally underreported story in America, the collapse of the rule of law in the home mortgage industry."

David Dayen is a contributing writer to Salon and The Intercept and a weekly columnist for the New Republic and the Fiscal Times. Other outlets that publish his work include Vice, The Nation, the American Prospect, Naked Capitalism, and In These Times. He lives in Los Angeles.

用户评论
三星半,剩了最后四十页没读下去。作者书写了次贷危机里影响极广,却差不多鲜为人知的银行种种惊人的操作,和普通人为揭发这些做的拼命努力。没能读完的原因是后半部显得太过重复,不管是故事发展还是银行的手法。另外我还是认为作者有明显的党派bias在里面,可以肯定这里面绝大部分错在银行和放贷的一连串机构,但那么多的买房人真的就完全无辜吗,是不是也不尽然?我认为涉及这类题材的书如果倾向过强,可能更会影响到中间派读者吸收与认同他的想法。
收藏