The Social Atom

Mark Buchanan

出版时间

2007-05-29

ISBN

9781596910133

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

The idiosyncrasies of human decision-making have confounded economists and social theorists for years. If each person makes choices for personal (and often irrational) reasons, how can people's choices be predicted by a single theory? How can "any" economic, social, or political theory be valid? The truth is, none of them really are. Mark Buchanan makes the fascinating argument that the science of physics is beginning to provide a new picture of the human or "social atom," and help us understand the surprising, and often predictable, patterns that emerge when they get together. Look at patterns, not people, Buchanan argues, and rules emerge that can explain how movements form, how interest groups operate, and even why ethnic hatred persists. Using similar observations, social physicists can predict whether neighborhoods will integrate, whether stock markets will crash, and whether crime waves will continue or abate. Brimming with mind games and provocative experiments, "The Social Atom" is an incisive, accessible, and comprehensive argument for a whole new way to look at human social behavior. Mark Buchanan is a theoretical physicist and an associate editor at "Complexus," a journal on biocomplexity. He has been an editor at "Nature" and "New Scientist," and is the author of two prize-nominated books, "Ubiquity: The Science of History" and "Nexus: Small Worlds and the Groundbreaking Science of Networks." He lives in Cambridgeshire, England. The idiosyncrasies of human decision-making have confounded economists and social theorists for years. If each person makes choices for personal (and often irrational) reasons, how can people's choices be predicted by a single theory? The validity of any economic, social, or political theory comes into question. Mark Buchanan argues that the science of physics is beginning to provide a new picture of the human or "social atom," and help us understand the surprising, and often predictable, patterns that emerge when they get together. Look at patterns, not people, Buchanan argues, and rules emerge that can explain how movements form, how interest groups operate, and even why ethnic hatred persists. Using similar observations, social physicists can predict whether neighborhoods will integrate, whether stock markets will crash, and whether crime waves will continue or abate. "The Social Atom" is an incisive, accessible, and comprehensive argument for a new way to look at human social behavior. "Mark Buchanan is] a theoretical physicist . . . Buchanan argues that one of the basic assumptions of economics--namely, that humans make only reasoned, greedy, self-promoting decisions--is a simplification that calls the whole field into question . . . A former editor of the prestigious science journal "Nature," Buchanan witnessed a growing number of physicists write papers about familiar mathematical patterns cropping up in human behavior. This inspired him to write "The Social Atom." His goal is to consider people 'as if they were atoms or molecules following fairly simple rules' and investigate the idea that 'seemingly complicated social happenings may often have quite simple origins, and that we can discover such simplicity by examining how we too may be subject to laws not unlike those of physics' . . . The book asks] readers to move away from thinking of humans as individuals when it comes to social behavior in a group. We are . . . simple atoms that think alike, copy one another and self-organize according to common mathematical patterns."--Russ Juskalian, "USA Today" "Humans mimic other humans, whether they're clapping or buying mobile phones, writes Mark Buchanan in his beguiling behavioral study . . . Yet the same force may influence bigger decisions in life, like whether to have kids, he says. European birthrates slowed so dramatically between 1950 and 2000 that researchers concluded the trend was 'amplified and exaggerated by peer pressure' . . . A theoretical physicist, Buchanan suggests that sociologists should spend less time scrutinizing individual behavior and more time studying the group. 'Think of patterns, not people, ' he urges, arguing that people are the atoms, or building blocks, of the social world. We imitate each other, cooperate, learn and adapt in a giant feedback system. Writing in lean, fluid sentences, Buchanan clicks through examples ranging from the collapse of Long-Term Capital Management to the slaughter at Srebrenica. He shows patterns at work in phantom traffic jams, stock sell-offs and the trails human feet carve through public parks . . . As promised in the book's subtitle, Buchanan explains 'Why the Rich Get Richer, Cheaters Get Caught, and Your Neighbor Usually Looks Like You' . . . Buchanan is] on to something big."--James Pressley, "Bloomberg News" "Likely the "Blink" or "Freakonomics "of 2007, theoretical physicist Buchanan's new book explains how we replicate the behavior of people we admire, and stick close to people with shared fu

AI导读
核心看点
  • 引入社会物理学视角,将人视为社会原子
  • 揭示群体行为背后的幂律与反馈机制
  • 主张通过观察模式而非个体来理解社会
适合谁读
  • 对复杂系统与社会学交叉领域感兴趣的读者
  • 希望从物理学角度重新审视人类行为的思考者
  • 关注群体决策、市场波动及社会现象规律的读者
读前提醒
  • 需具备一定科学思维基础,理解物理模型隐喻
  • 书中论证较为发散,建议结合案例辅助理解
  • 关注模式规律而非纠结于个体理性的局限
读者共识
  • 观点新颖独特,带来跨学科的思想冲击
  • 部分读者认为论证深度不足,略显浅尝辄止
  • 翻译质量参差不齐,可能影响阅读体验

本导读基于书籍简介、目录、原文摘录、短评和书评生成,不等同于全文精读。

精彩摘录
  • "但至少我们应该赞赏德国剧作家高特厚德 莱辛(Gotthold Lessing)在1778年表达的观点: “一个人之所以有价值,并不在于他拥有多少真理,或认为自己掌握多少真理,而在于他为了探索真理,做出了多少诚实的努力。因为真正让一个人的力量扩大的,不是对真理的占有,而是对真理孜孜不倦的探寻。单单做到这一点,这个人就趋于完美了。""
  • "研究人员的分析表明,要是参赛者们能更大胆地放手一搏,那么原本有更多人能赢得那100万,参赛人员赢得奖金的总数也会更大。一般说来,一个理性的人会比一个现实的人赢得更多,因为现实的人特别想规避巨大的损失。而有趣的是,还有研究者在实验室里的灵长类动物身上,也发现了类似于“规避损失”的行为倾向。"
  • "进行任何任务(譬如建书架、找工作)最好的方法之一通常就是先开始着手做起来,尽管你对于开展任务的最佳方法还没有清楚的概念。你先尝试做某些事情,然后学到经验有所收获,并开始学着去调节适应。正如雅各布.布朗诺斯基曾经说过的,“要掌握这个世界,只能靠行动,不能靠思索。”"
  • "在生活中,我们所做的重大决定,比如生不生孩子,做不做这个职业,都是对外力-社会力-所做出的回应,而这种社会力无论在形式上还是在影响力上,都和音乐会结束时控制掌声的模式没多大区别,想到这儿不免叫人沮丧。但是,我们是彻头彻尾的社会人,嵌入社会群体之中,既不是独一无二的,也不如我们想象的那么自由。"
  • "约翰逊的技巧是在90年代晚期,物理学家张翼成(Yi-Cheng Zhang)和达弥恩·夏利(Damien Challet)杰出的研究成果的基础上发展而来的。当时,这两位物理学家都在瑞士弗里堡大学任职。他们在阿瑟的酒吧模式的基础上,尽量地简化细节,做出了一个少数群体游戏(Minority Game)的模型。在这个模型中有一群人,每人每一轮必须在数字0和1之间做一个选择,目的就是要成为少数人群中的一分子,也就是选择大多数人不会选的数字。这个游戏基本上和阿瑟的酒吧模型一样,只不过逻辑上更简单。玩这个少数群体游戏的人在做选择之前,先查看了近来选择结果的记录,看看每一轮是选0的人多,还是选1的人多,然后"
  • "从逻辑上来说,不管遇到怎样的情况,我们每个人都必定有一道门槛,尽管这道门槛很难具体明确。按照格兰诺维特的说法,每个人在考虑是否要做一件事(这里是指暴乱行动)时,都会权衡这么做可能得到的利益和付出的成本,而门槛则反映了利益超出成本的值。重点是,利益和成本之间的平衡一般不仅仅取决于个人的偏好,而且还取决于其他人都在做什么,做得怎么样。这种门槛的存在,反映了人的行为受到人际影响,而这种影响力使得对群体行为作出预测变得极其困难。 打个比方,想象一下100个人每个人都有0到99不等的门槛值,某个人的门槛值是0,另一个是1,接下来一个是2,以此类推。那么在这种情况下,一场大暴乱是在所难免的。那个门槛值是0"
  • "理解事务的唯一方式是对模式进行思考,而不是对人。"
  • "While we may a long way from identifying strict "laws" for the human world, scientists have discovered lawlike regularities there and now recognize that such regularities in no way conflict with the existence of individual free will; we can be free individual whose actions, in combination, lead to p"
用户评论
人是原子,社會是分子--多的是模式。
关于人类行为的统一理论
社科一样遵循两条最基本的自然定律:1. 同一场论 2. 测不准原则
看看
没说透
啥啊这写的是...
(core 社科driving)證據證據證據,踏踏實實的證實比故作的高深酷太多。
first week's reading for international development
收藏