书籍 The Chomsky-Foucault Debate的封面

The Chomsky-Foucault Debate

Noam Chomsky

出版时间

2006-09-01

ISBN

9781595581341

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

Two of the twentieth century's most influential thinkers debate a perennial question.

In 1971, at the height of the Vietnam War and at a time of great political and social instability, two of the world's leading intellectuals, Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault, were invited by Dutch philosopher Fons Edlers to debate an age-old question: is there such a thing as "innate" human nature independent of our experiences and external influences?

The resulting dialogue is one of the most original, provocative, and spontaneous exchanges to have occurred between contemporary philosophers, and above all serves as a concise introduction to their basic theories. What begins as a philosophical argument rooted in linguistics (Chomsky) and the theory of knowledge (Foucault), soon evolves into a broader discussion encompassing a wide range of topics, from science, history, and behaviorism to creativity, freedom, and the struggle for justice in the realm of politics.

In addition to the debate itself, this volume features a newly written introduction by noted Foucault scholar John Rajchman and includes additional text by Noam Chomsky.

Noam Chomsky is Professor of Linguistics at MIT and a world-renowned political thinker and activist. The author of numerous books, including On Language and Understanding Power (both available from The New Press), he lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Michel Foucault (1926-84) held a chair in the History of Systems of Thought at the Collège de France. The New Press has publishe...

(展开全部)

用户评论
前面1/3感覺兩人有點雞同鴨講,但到後面疏順了許多。單就human nature這個問題上,我還是比較同意chomsky的。
看完了,读到后面明显越来越顺。。。当然我还是有一些问题看不太懂,作为我第一本看的真·政治哲学相关,值得纪念(。等我把chomsky和Foucault俩人的著作读一些之后会回来重读第一篇辩论的!(港真其实福柯后面那些文章对我启发大?(。
赫赫,卖萌。 乔姆斯基在这里就是纳伊夫的代言人。。。福柯就自顾自卖萌
补。This is representative of a general demarcation between the ideologies of humanities and sciences. Should be recommended to anyone who study 理科
看了视频,现在会觉得比较好懂啦
鸡同鸭讲的辩论 一涉及到根本的形而上学分歧便没有可以讨论的了 反倒是最后的两篇福柯的演讲很有意思 从权力结构的精确运用去分析现代的labor/domestic society
架空了本身存在的限制當然是更有創造力 也更違背當下的前提 龐大的修辭學 語言 宿命博弈
@2012-05-26 23:04:42
Z-Library