Race After Technology

Ruha Benjamin

出版社

Polity

出版时间

2019-01-01

ISBN

9781509526406

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

From everyday apps to complex algorithms, Ruha Benjamin cuts through tech-industry hype to understand how emerging technologies can reinforce White supremacy and deepen social inequity.

Benjamin argues that automation, far from being a sinister story of racist programmers scheming on the dark web, has the potential to hide, speed up, and deepen discrimination while appearing neutral and even benevolent when compared to the racism of a previous era. Presenting the concept of the “New Jim Code,” she shows how a range of discriminatory designs encode inequity by explicitly amplifying racial hierarchies; by ignoring but thereby replicating social divisions; or by aiming to fix racial bias but ultimately doing quite the opposite. Moreover, she makes a compelling case for race itself as a kind of technology, designed to stratify and sanctify social injustice in the architecture of everyday life.

This illuminating guide provides conceptual tools for decoding tech promises with sociologically informed skepticism. In doing so, it challenges us to question not only the technologies we are sold but also the ones we ourselves manufacture.

Ruha Benjamin is Associate Professor of African American Studies at Princeton University

用户评论
what is fairness?
Chap3, 论点不算新颖,看到津巴布韦同意中国公司对津巴布韦公民进行面部识别这个例子还是蛮感慨...
「种族也是一种技术」,像是「xx也是一种技术/权力/社会建构」这种主题的量产物,中规中矩吧
论述层次搭得不是很清晰,所以显得像是一味在罗列例子,没有深入下去。虽然作者强调“think description”,可是其实观点里明明内含逻辑,但是罗列的方式导致层次非常不清晰显得浅白,偶尔反而感觉削弱了论点。布置给本科生做读书报告,学生们倒是觉得很受启发 。
没有什么洞见,更建议对technology&culture感兴趣的伙伴去看the age of surveillance capitalism
读了第一章。race itself as technology这个提法于我很新颖,是冲着这个来看的,但是第一章涉及的不多,总体来说就是作为一个management的tool来理解吧。观点读起来好像比较零散,用了很多例子,印象比较深刻的是苹果那个。资本主义相当灵活,要是符合利益那么种族多元可以是合作的对象,要是不符合利益那么就弃之如敝屣。
论点和论据都不是很新颖了,但是通过theoretical framework建立起conceptual connection的论述结构还是值得学习。
FMD 130留
收藏