书籍 Immaterialism的封面

Immaterialism

Graham Harman, 格拉汉姆·哈曼

出版社

Polity

出版时间

2016-06-27

ISBN

9781509500970

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍
What objects exist in the social world and how should we understand them? Is a specific Pizza Hut restaurant as real as the employees, tables, napkins and pizzas of which it is composed, and as real as the Pizza Hut corporation with its headquarters in Wichita, the United States, the planet Earth and the social and economic impact of the restaurant on the lives of its employees and customers? In this book the founder of object-oriented philosophy develops his approach in order to shed light on the nature and status of objects in social life. While it is often assumed that an interest in objects amounts to a form of materialism, Harman rejects this view and develops instead an “immaterialist” method. By examining the work of leading contemporary thinkers such as Bruno Latour and Levi Bryant, he develops a forceful critique of ‘actor-network theory’. In an extended discussion of Leibniz’s famous example of the Dutch East India Company, Harman argues that this company qualifies for objecthood neither through ‘what it is’ or ‘what it does’, but through its irreducibility to either of these forms. The phases of its life, argues Harman, are not demarcated primarily by dramatic incidents but by moments of symbiosis, a term he draws from the biologist Lynn Margulis.
用户评论
虽然我知道你为什么举东印度公司的例子,但是也没必要举成这个样子吧
Clear and reactionary.
OOO作为方法,也是看到现在最从内容上体现出 Harman 对 Latour 相爱相杀(虽然他也整天挂在嘴上)的一本。抛去那些站死的本体论立场不谈、其实OOO和ANT在方法上完全是 complementary的吧。
1.荷兰东印度公司在东南亚的兴衰,也交待了物向的社会理论,但嵌合得不好,还是像两码事。 2.给OOO加了新东西。一是symbiosis,它提供了事物的传记:事情改变,不是对着自己心里小小的忏悔室告解,而是遇到了其他事件。但事物不总是变,它漫长地停滞、偶尔转换。 3.二是用反事实的情况去质问overmining。 4.还是看不出OOO的魅力,它不有趣,太贴近常识;也不好用,我们不知道它的问题究竟是什么?
哈曼五评ANT理论
为Thesis扯淡而读,第一章洋洋洒洒几百字证明我Thesis两个出发点是错的,需要第三个视角来判定object relations,关键第三视角还没说清(或者我没看懂)我无语。不过介绍给了我OOO,算是没白看。后段VOC因为举的例子太无趣 实在看不下去
Z-Library