Extraterritoriality

Victor Fan

出版时间

2019-07-31

ISBN

9781474440424

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

Actively rewrites and reconfigures how Hong Kong cinema and media are to be defined and located

Examining how Hong Kong filmmakers, spectators and critics wrestled with this perturbation between the Leftist Riots (1967) and the aftermath of the Umbrella Movement (2014), this book traces how Hong Kong’s extraterritoriality has been framed: in its position of being doubly occupied and doubly abandoned by contesting juridical, political, linguistic and cultural forces.

Extraterritoriality scrutinises creative works in mainstream cinema, independent films, television, video artworks and documentaries – especially those by marginalised artists – actively rewriting and reconfiguring how Hong Kong cinema and media are to be defined and located.

Key features

Proposes extraterritoriality as a key theoretical concept

Forms a dialogue with Postcolonial Studies and Sinophone Studies

Offers in-depth archival studies of the Hong Kong film industry, television and video arts, as well as major political crises in Hong Kong, including the 1967 Riots, the Sino-British negotiation of Hong Kong’s ‘future’, the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement and the Umbrella Movement

Victor Fan is Senior Lecturer at Film Studies, King’s College London and Film Consultant of the Chinese Visual Festival. His articles have appeared in journals including Camera Obscura, Journal of Chinese Cinemas, Screen and Film History: An International Journal. His first book, 'Cinema Approaching Reality: Locating Chinese Film Theory', was published in 2015 by the University...

(展开全部)

目录
Acknowledgements
Notes on Transliteration
On Extraterritoriality
Chapter 1: What is Hong Kong Cinema?
Chapter 2: Breaking the Wave

显示全部
用户评论
Victor是我很熟悉的老师。他认为香港的电影和媒体自始至终存在一种“域外性”,这种域外性居于中国甚至英国的边缘。(比如说粤语片制作在国民政府的电影政策被限制等等)。所在在本书的案例中,他找的都是一些很个人化的创作者,来说明香港电影在找寻自身身份的历史嬗变。
佛学造诣居然也这么高深。
范可樂在cinema approaching reality裡寫費穆的小城之春,也很精彩
海外中国电影研究书写域外的自身话语的确立,不好评价。对某些电影文本的读解新颖。
将香港媒体及电影的“发声”归结于其政治和历史的域外性, 的确有其根源,但是否过于强调电影的政治性,而忽略了其他方面
收藏