Cinema Against Doublethink - David Martin-Jones

Cinema Against Doublethink

David Martin-Jones

出版社

Routledge

出版时间

2018-09-28

ISBN

9781317440765

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

When is it OK to lie about the past? If history is a story, then everyone knows that the 'official story' is told by the winners. No matter what we may know about how the past really happened, history is as it is recorded: this is what George Orwell called doublethink. But what happens to all the lost, forgotten, censored, and disappeared pasts of world history? Cinema Against Doublethink uncovers how a world of cinemas acts as a giant archive of these lost pasts, a vast virtual store of the world’s memories. The most enchanting and disturbing films of recent years – Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall his Past Lives, Nostalgia for the Light, Even the Rain, The Act of Killing, Carancho, Lady Vengeance – create ethical encounters with these lost pasts, covering vast swathes of the planet and crossing huge eras of time. Analysed using the philosophies of Gilles Deleuze (the time-image) and Enrique Dussel (transmodern ethics), the multitudinous cinemas of the world are shown to speak out against doublethink, countering this biggest lie of all with their myriad 'false' versions of world history. Cinema, acting against doublethink, remains a powerful agent for reclaiming the truth of history for the 'post-truth' era.

David Martin-Jonesis Professor of Film Studies, University of Glasgow, UK. His research uses philosophy to explore world cinemas. He is the author/editor of eight books, has published in numerous international journals (e.g. Cinema Journal, Screen, Third Text), and edits the Bloomsbury series Thinking Cinema.

目录
Table of Contents
List of figures
Acknowledgements
Preface
Introduction: One or many pasts?

显示全部
用户评论
非常后殖民的一本书。作者认为殖民叙事常常将电影对历史的叙事萎缩到统一的叙事,这造成一种奥威尔的双重思考(一种分裂感?)。作者很有意思得把墨西哥学者杜塞尔的解放思想和德勒兹的时间影像理论结合在一起,去思考世界电影是如何将多种时间的体验呈现开来,形成观众与历史更多元的伦理接触。主要读了自然接触部分:人类社会在自然留下的痕迹,其实能触动更深层次的对人类世视域下星球性历史的挖掘。论点“《波米叔叔》里的“非人自然接触” 在将自然从人所创造的殖民现代性中拯救。但反对单一历史观,可能作者还是老白,从老白的视角搞着拯救世界的后殖民梦。这套话语在中国研究很陈腐了。
收藏