Our Great Qing

Johan Elverskog

出版时间

2006-07-01

ISBN

9780824830212

评分

★★★★★

标签

历史

书籍介绍

"In a sweeping overview of four centuries of Mongolian history that draws on previously untapped sources, Johan Elverskog opens up totally new perspectives on some of the most urgent questions historians have recently raised about the role of Buddhism in the constitution of the Qing empire. Theoretically informed and strongly comparative in approach, Elverskog’s work tells a fascinating and important story that will interest all scholars working at the intersection of religion and politics." —Mark Elliott, Harvard University

"Johan Elverskog has rewritten the political and intellectual history of Mongolia from the bottom up, telling a convincing story that clarifies for the first time the revolutions which Mongolian concepts of community, rule, and religion underwent from 1500 to 1900. His account of Qing rule in Mongolia doesn’t just tell us what images the Qing emperors wished to project, but also what images the Mongols accepted themselves, and how these changed over the centuries. In the scope of time it covers, the originality of the views advanced, and the accuracy of the scholarship upon which it is based, Our Great Qing seems destined to mark a watershed in Mongolian studies. It will be essential reading for specialists in Mongolian studies and will make an important contribution and riposte to the ‘new Qing history’ now changing the face of late imperial Chinese history. Specialists in Tibetan Buddhism and Buddhism’s interaction with the political realm will also find in this work challenging and thought-provoking." —ChristopherAtwood, Indiana University

Although it is generally believed that the Manchus controlled the Mongols through their patronage of Tibetan Buddhism, scant attention has been paid to the Mongol view of the Qing imperial project. In contrast to other accounts of Manchu rule, Our Great Qing focuses not only on what images the metropole wished to project into Mongolia, but also on what images the Mongols acknowledged themselves. Rather than accepting the Manchu’s use of Buddhism, Johan Elverskog begins by questioning the static, unhistorical, and hegemonic view of political life implicit in the Buddhist explanation. By stressing instead the fluidity of identity and Buddhist practice as processes continually developing in relation to state formations, this work explores how Qing policies were understood by Mongols and how they came to see themselves as Qing subjects.

In his investigation of Mongol society on the eve of the Manchu conquest, Elverskog reveals the distinctive political theory of decentralization that fostered the civil war among the Mongols. He explains how it was that the Manchu Great Enterprise was not to win over "Mongolia" but was instead to create a unified Mongol community of which the disparate preexisting communities would merely be component parts.

A key element fostering this change was the Qing court’s promotion of Gelukpa orthodoxy, which not only transformed Mongol historical narratives and rituals but also displaced the earlier vernacular Mongolian Buddhism. Finally, Elverskog demonstrates how this eighteenth-century conception of a Mongol community, ruled by an aristocracy and nourished by a Buddhist emperor, gave way to a pan-Qing solidarity of all Buddhist peoples against Muslims and Christians and to local identities that united for the first time aristocrats with commoners in a new Mongol Buddhist identity on the eve of the twentieth century.

目录
Acknowledgments
Note on Transcription
Mongol Reign Periods
Qing Reign Periods
Introduction

显示全部
用户评论
对于满族如何将蒙古纳入帝国版图的原因与过程,作者对常见的“佛教决定论”提出了反驳,认为相同的宗教信仰和单纯以清帝为转轮王的思想不是蒙古依附于清帝国的直接原因。作者基于“乌璐斯”和“多罗”的政治架构展开讨论,分析了蒙古从各自为政到共同认同一个统一于清帝国之下的“蒙古身份”的缓慢过程。
"在满族人推广独特的佛教话语的过程中,作为蒙古人和佛教徒脱离了任何早期对当地社区及其宗教政治边界的认同。相反,身为蒙古人和佛教徒成为了清朝佛教徒身份的固有组成部分。这三者已经交织在一起:身为蒙古人和佛教徒也意味着身为清朝人。"十九世纪,蒙古人的身份开始在清朝国家结构所允许的两个方向上表现出来。一个方向是走向跨民族的佛教大清,其中蒙古人在佛教大清中构成一个群体;另一个是走向本土的地缘政治实体的旗。虽然这两种身份继续在佛教话语中运作,但它们也在应对19世纪的剧烈变化和动荡。正是这些发展解释了为什么1903年由贵族和平民组成的乌审和鄂托克的武装团伙在领地问题上相互争斗,同时也解释了为什么蒙古人与汉人和清政府一起对抗穆斯林、基督教和西方帝国主义对信奉佛教的清朝的威胁。
问题倒是很大,但是写的不够好。全变成文字游戏了。
读了一半读不下去了,research question非常有趣:从归清的各个蒙古部族角度来解释他们是如何identify自己以及如何理解自己as part of qing的,作者自己也是说这本书的角度与以往单方面以乾隆亲达赖来解释各部归顺是不一样的。但真开始写了就没啥意思了。
写的蛮清晰的,这一点就挺难得了。其他问题可以再讨论
粗读了一遍,我完全赞同石滨裕美子对这本书的批评。 首先,不要把蒙古人的观念变化都归结为清朝主动的导引,而没有充分考虑西藏的影响是本书的最大硬伤。或者说,清廷与蒙古诸部是在怎样的互动中给佛教找到了一个彼此都接受的生长空间。从这个角度看,作者没有真正解决问题。 我们只看到了对文本的翻译,而文本背后各方的角力过程,并没有被建构起来。 其次,作者把ulus/törö当作理解17世纪满蒙关系的切入点,也让人感到费解。至少在清初的蒙古文书中,真正并列出现的术语是törö/šaǰin,而与此相关的是作者宣称要超越的qoyar yosu模式(这里定义混乱)。 最后,我同意清朝reunified and created the mongols的观点,但这只是个结论,是需要论证的。现在欠缺的就是论证这个过程。
从满洲联蒙古,蒙古联西藏,到成吉思汗12,13世纪的亚欧大陆温带草原的大联盟,深刻解析tribal confederation对单元民族和文化的尊重。
收藏