Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics

Gerardo L. Munck

出版时间

2007-05-30

ISBN

9780801884641

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

Review

"An intellectual tour of the discipline of comparative politics with some of its most creative pioneers and contemporary practitioners. The carefully organized interviews offer surprising perspectives about our eclectic and evolving field, and remind us of why we became scholars of comparative politics in the first place." -- Edward Gibson, Northwestern University

"This fascinating history of comparative politics offers a panoramic view of major debates and of trends in theoretical and methodological approaches over the second half of the 20th century. It brings the field to life by letting scholars who shaped it sketch their own intellectual biographies. Reading it is a truly enriching and enjoyable experience for any comparativist." -- Evelyne Huber, University of North Carolina

"This book fills a huge void in the profession of political science. Through a series of fifteen carefully prepared and referenced, wide-ranging, and often captivating interviews with many of the most influential scholars of comparative politics, we gain a priceless perspective on the growth of the discipline and the craft of research and theory building. In their intelligent and probing interviews (and very valuable introductory chapters), Munck and Snyder go a long way toward correcting our crippling deficit in professional memory, while revealing the life histories, moral convictions, intellectual passions, and divergent theoretical and methodological approaches that have shaped and advanced comparative politics in the last half-century. This book should be read by everyone who is preparing for, or thinking about, a career in political science, no matter the field." -- Larry Diamond, coeditor, Journal of Democracy

"Reading autobiographical reflections of notable scholars is a pleasurable way of learning about a field of study. These interviews cover a good slice of modern comparative government. They are wide ranging, focused, and informative. And fun to read." -- Nelson W. Polsby, University of California, Berkeley

"To show how great works that have shaped our understanding of politics and society are rooted in individual lives is a wonderful project. Munck and Snyder are the best of guides. Thoroughly informed about the scholarship, they explore the personal side with deftness, tact, and imagination. The result is a series of lively and revealing intellectual portraits." -- Dietrich Rueschemeyer, Watson Institute for International Studies

"A fascinating oral history of comparative politics in the United States. You could read the collected books and articles of all the fifteen leading lights represented here and never grasp the insights that these interviews offer: how wars, immigration, and the economy shaped the research agenda; how the backgrounds, personalities, and life experiences of these scholars guided their work; and how these scholars evaluate one another and those beyond this elite circle. Munck and Snyder have performed an invaluable service to the discipline." -- Michael Coppedge, University of Notre Dame

"This distinctive book frequently illuminates the dynamics of major scholars' research agendas (and of their career paths more generally), thus making it highly recommended reading for researchers in this subfield." -- Choice

"I told my qualitative research class to read at least three of the interviews in the book and summarize what they took from each. The response was amazing. Most of them had read most of the book. They were moved, inspired, and reassured by it. Each of them felt validated by something one of these scholars said. We ended up discussing the interviews through much of the class... the discussion of how real scholars relate their world and their scholarship was so exciting to them that I didn't want to stop it. So thanks... for helping them to bridge the often daunting distance between themselves and the names on the texts they read in class -- it was truly rewarding." -- Margaret Keck, Johns Hopkins University

Product Description

In the first collection of interviews with the most prominent scholars in comparative politics since World War II, Gerardo L. Munck and Richard Snyder trace key developments in the field during the twentieth century.

Organized around a broad set of themes -- intellectual formation and training; major works and ideas; the craft and tools of research; colleagues, collaborators, and students; and the past and future of comparative politics -- these in-depth interviews offer unique and candid reflections that bring the research process to life and shed light on the human dimension of scholarship.

Giving voice to scholars who practice their craft in different ways yet share a passion for knowledge about global politics, Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics offers a wealth of insights into contemporary debates about the state of kn

AI导读
核心看点
  • 比较政治学大师访谈录
  • 展现学科演进与学术史
  • 探讨研究方法与学术激情
适合谁读
  • 政治学研究生
  • 比较政治研究者
  • 人文社科爱好者
读前提醒
  • 了解背景知识更佳
  • 关注学者个人经历
  • 结合原著对照阅读
读者共识
  • 学术启蒙必读佳作
  • 轻松易读不枯燥
  • 展现大师真实一面

本导读基于书籍简介、目录、原文摘录、短评和书评生成,不等同于全文精读。

精彩摘录
  • "问:您的工作在多大程度上受到了现实世界重大事件的影响? 答:在我成长过程中,一个问题接着另一个问题,一场灾难接着另一场灾难,形势很糟糕。1937年我在巴黎,正值西班牙内战,我清楚地记得报纸上有关桑坦德陷落的大标题,那又一次让我觉得如鲠在喉。我被那些芝加哥的失业工人们打动,他们过来跟我说:“我的孩子连双鞋也没有,大冬天他们脚上湿漉漉的,他们还得了病。我能不能见见我的社工,请她开张证明给我拿去百货店,或许他们能给我双鞋?”就是这些让我那时候成了某种意义上持左翼政治立场的社会科学家。另一方面,我没有轻易接受任何人的说法。如果马克思说资产阶级掌握了如此这般的权力,我反问自己,真的是这样吗?我得走出去看"
  • "问:能否请您给在比较政治领域刚刚起步的研究生们提一些建议? 答:头一件事就是去某些陌生的外国转转。从比较政治之父孟德斯鸠开始,这已经成了每个人的本能。孟德斯鸠写了一个想象中的波斯,某个他发明出来的波斯。他需要借波斯来指桑骂槐说说法国的事情。托克维尔也是如此,他说过当他在《论美国的民主》中描述美国时,法兰西时时萦绕心头(Tocqueville 1969)。历代所有伟大的政治理论家都面临作比较的需要。"
  • "问:最优秀学生的标志性特点是什么? 答:显然他们必须得聪明。但是聪明是许多学生的特点,所以智力本身并不能区分出最好的学生。好奇心很重要。他们必须有动力,而不是无精打采的。此外,对最优秀的学生来说,学习政治不仅涉及他们的智力,而且还涉及他们的身心。得有感情,有情感。 问:激情! 答:激情,没错,这是所有优秀学生都有的品质。最后,我最好的学生——不一定是其他人眼中最好的学生——与现实世界和现实中的人保持着某种联系。他们对政治研究的兴趣不仅仅是受图书馆或数学的驱策。人们对外面的世界得有一些直觉层面的理解。"
  • "如果你不享受你的工作,它就不会做得好。我认为无论是绘画、写作还是研究都是如此。我不是说每一分钟都必须是愉快的。可能会有一些苦差事,但必须有更多的东西,必须有乐趣和智力上的满足——也许是因为看到一件著作即将完成,或者是感觉一件事情适合你。如果你没有得到那种满足感,何必做这些事呢?有时,当我看到《美国政治科学评论》上发表的文章时,我会问自己:“这个人真的为这种研究感到兴奋吗?”"
  • "我看不出规范性关切和做科学研究的抱负之间有什么矛盾。事实上,我认为一个规范性的和规定性的(prescriptive)结论可以从大多数的经验关系中得出来。"
  • "诀窍是在现有研究的基础上,不受其约束,既要在范式内工作,又要在范式外思考。要持怀疑态度,不要把常规的、公认的智慧视为理所当然,要有原创性。"
  • "问:您对今天进入比较政治领域的人有什么建议? 答:首先,问问你自己,你是否对自己国家之外的世界真正感兴趣,对其他人和其他地方、他们如何生活、他们如何生存,是否真正抱有人文兴趣。这是首要的、关键的条件。其次,至少了解一个并非你本国的国家。这意味着得学习语言,与各种各样的人交谈,花时间去各种各样的地方,结识那些不住在首都的人们。然后你才可能写一些好东西。但是,如果你想在不离开自己国家(无论是身体上还是精神上)的情况下做比较政治,那么你最好去选另一个领域。这是我的基本建议。"
  • "当你全神贯注于一些智力上的事情,日思夜想,甚至在做白日梦时也会想着,那是非常富有成效的。"
作者简介
Gerardo L. Munck is an associate professor at the School of International Relations, University of Southern California and the author of the award-winning book Authoritarianism and Democratization: Soldiers and Workers in Argentina, 1976–83. Richard Snyder is an associate professor of political science at Brown University and author of Politics after Neoliberalism: Reregulation in Mexico.
目录
Preface
1. The Human Dimension of Comparative Research
2. The Past and Present of Comparative Politics
The Interviews
3. Gabriel A. Almond: Structial Functionalism and Political Development

显示全部
用户评论
大家的学术人生 这三个关键词写PS的时候很有用
时间不一样 心安理得做人的难度也不一样:)
今年到现在读到最好的一本书!!
恨自己当年怎么没有买到原版(在世的还有几人?)
我两的床头读物,没有passion的时候来找找passion。Laitin的部分也意外的有趣呀,亨廷顿嘛,你大爷还是那个大爷。
比较政治学访谈录天花板。
慢悠悠地读,先标一下
Moore和Huntington都是真性情。
收藏