书籍 The Case against Education的封面

The Case against Education

Bryan Caplan

出版时间

2018-01-16

ISBN

9780691174655

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍
Despite being immensely popular--and immensely lucrative—education is grossly overrated. In this explosive book, Bryan Caplan argues that the primary function of education is not to enhance students' skill but to certify their intelligence, work ethic, and conformity—in other words, to signal the qualities of a good employee. Learn why students hunt for easy As and casually forget most of what they learn after the final exam, why decades of growing access to education have not resulted in better jobs for the average worker but instead in runaway credential inflation, how employers reward workers for costly schooling they rarely if ever use, and why cutting education spending is the best remedy. Caplan draws on the latest social science to show how the labor market values grades over knowledge, and why the more education your rivals have, the more you need to impress employers. He explains why graduation is our society's top conformity signal, and why even the most useless degrees can certify employability. He advocates two major policy responses. The first is educational austerity. Government needs to sharply cut education funding to curb this wasteful rat race. The second is more vocational education, because practical skills are more socially valuable than teaching students how to outshine their peers. Romantic notions about education being "good for the soul" must yield to careful research and common sense — The Case against Education points the way. (less)
用户评论
很有说服力 但是没有实验证明
Interesting to see the statistics that Caplan lays out, but I find his arguments laden with a fair amount of loopholes and contradictions, as well as a great deal of conceit. For example, he fails to think of how the utility of the things learnt in school to daily life. Chapter 10 is a surprisingly large eyesore!
经济学家自己反对自己。论点并不新。
trolling with bountiful quantitative studies lol. i m convinced. i especially like the part where he confessed that some data he used r practically guesswork. zero chance of the policies proposed in the book will be implemented though. will read up all his works.
刚看的时候感觉很爽,本身我也不是个好学生,还嫌自己在学校玩儿少了,真不该上那些莫名其妙的课。看到后来其实也扪心自问,既然大家应该注重真正的能力而不是学历,那么我真正的能力究竟如何呢?我在对现行教育制度嗤之以鼻的同时,真的没有占它一点好处吗?真的就没有学历比我低,而能力远大于我的人吗?
行文非常流畅但是也充满偏见,外行写教育,天啊首先作者本身就是教育的产物能写出如此文章,也是教育体系的功劳,第二,文中描述了很多诸如教育如生活,如果都用功利的角度看待的话,全部要转换成看得见的有用的价值的话,人生充满权衡,活得很累,第三,太多了不想说了,作者整个价值体系都是混乱单一的,不值得啊,还写了五年,非常偏颇
重复论证太多了。我知道他说的问题,但是给个解决方法呗
赞同思考、再思考教育之“用”,但对书中给出的标准,不太认同,经济学家的视角太冷峻了些。
Z-Library