书籍 The Moment of Caravaggio的封面

The Moment of Caravaggio

Michael Fried

出版时间

2010-08-17

ISBN

9780691147017

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍
This is a groundbreaking examination of one of the most important artists in the Western tradition by one of the leading art historians and critics of the past half-century. In his first extended consideration of the Italian Baroque painter Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio (1573-1610), Michael Fried offers a transformative account of the artist's revolutionary achievement. Based on the A. W. Mellon Lectures in the Fine Arts delivered at the National Gallery of Art, "The Moment of Caravaggio" displays Fried's unique combination of interpretive brilliance, historical seriousness, and theoretical sophistication, providing sustained and unexpected readings of a wide range of major works, from the early "Boy Bitten by a Lizard" to the late "Martyrdom of Saint Ursula". And with close to 200 color images, "The Moment of Caravaggio" is as richly illustrated as it is closely argued. The result is an electrifying new perspective on a crucial episode in the history of European painting. Focusing on the emergence of the full-blown 'gallery picture' in Rome during the last decade of the sixteenth century and the first decades of the seventeenth, Fried draws forth an expansive argument, one that leads to a radically revisionist account of Caravaggio's relation to the self-portrait; of the role of extreme violence in his art, as epitomized by scenes of decapitation; and of the deep structure of his epoch-defining realism. Fried also gives considerable attention to the art of Caravaggio's great rival, Annibale Carracci, as well as to the work of Caravaggio's followers, including Orazio and Artemisia Gentileschi, Bartolomeo Manfredi, and Valentin de Boulogne.
用户评论
画册没办法,全仗技术。越新出的印的越好。除了米开朗基罗天顶与壁画被倭奴修坏了
弗雷德围绕狄德罗、库尔贝、马奈而展开的反剧场性三部曲,实在是太黑格尔了。这不禁令人格外好奇,弗雷德对卡拉瓦乔、埃金斯、门泽尔这类所谓“插曲”的研究,究竟能在其体系中占据什么样的位置。弗雷德的卡拉瓦乔研究是对上述潜在的黑格尔式模型的一个修正:整个反剧场性史诗的起点不再是狄德罗一代的法国画家,而是卡拉瓦乔一代的意大利画家。但这随即引出了一个更复杂的问题,一个历史发生学的问题:如果“狄德罗—库尔贝—马奈”这条线索的辩证发展姑且可以解释为法国艺术内部问题式的演进,那么卡拉瓦乔这个新的起点又是如何影响后来法国艺术的反剧场性事业的呢?还是说,两者间的关联根本不是历史上的,而是(很成问题的)结构上的?遗憾的是,由于弗雷德有意回避社会历史的研究取径,他没能很好地回答这个问题。
水平相当高的演讲集结成书。本以为会很难读,但实际上非常流畅,作者运用"浸入“和“分离”这个高度理论化的角度和概念来解读卡拉瓦乔乃止艺术创作者和作品之间关系这个主线,跳出了几乎已经是烂俗的关于卡拉瓦乔研究的思路,为相关学术史增添了重要的维度和紧迫性。该思路同时与历史研究紧密相连,或者说用这样带有结构性的角度来approach卡拉瓦乔活跃的年代意大利视觉艺术的重大转型。和卡拉奇几幅画作的比较很精彩,更令我惊喜的是,作者终于在书里针对卡拉瓦乔和普桑,这一对几乎完全是处于两个极端的艺术家之间给出了比较深刻的对比,绝不是基于关于这两个画家陈词滥调的认识的recount,这很难得。结尾提到策兰更是非常优秀的升华
Z-Library