书籍 Leviathan and the Air-Pump的封面

Leviathan and the Air-Pump

Steven Shapin, Simon Schaffer

出版时间

1989-10-01

ISBN

9780691024325

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍
In the aftermath of the English Civil War, as people were groping for new forms of political order, Robert Boyle built an air-pump to do exper-iments. Does the story of Roundheads and Restoration have something to do with the origins of experimental sci-ence? Schaffer and Shapin believed it does. Focusing on the debates between Boyle and his archcritic Thomas Hobbes over the air-pump, the authors proposed that "solutions to the problem of knowledge are solutions to the problem of social order." Both Boyle and Hobbes were looking for ways of establishing knowledge that did not decay into ad hominem attacks and political division. Boyle proposed the experiment as cure. He argued that facts should be manufactured by machines like the air-pump so that gentlemen could witness the experiments and produce knowledge that everyone agreed on. Hobbes, by contrast, looked for natural law and viewed experiments as the artificial, unreliable products of an exclusive guild. The new approaches taken in Leviathan and the Air-Pump have been enormously influential on historical studies of science. Shapin and Schaffer found a moment of scientific revolution and showed how key scientific givens--facts, interpretations, experiment, truth--were fundamental to a new political order. Shapin and Schaffer were also innovative in their ethnographic approach. Attempting to understand the work habits, rituals, and social structures of a remote, unfamiliar group, they argued that politics were tied up in what scientists did, rather than what they said.
用户评论
1。行文有大妈八卦气质。2。作者不是学science的。
rigorous historical work; outrageous conclusion
有点意外,这书读起来其实还蛮有意思的。。这种方法似乎也可以用在近代中国科学/玄学、中医/西医的各种有关真理、知识、科学普及的“研究”里去。
终于把它从头到尾读了一遍,有种并不意外的亲切感。
赛先生的德先生这两剂复兴国族光荣的药方最后演变成corporate capitalism,两者背后所代表的知识特质除了具有相互牵扯的发展之外,经常出现冲突的情形,特别是将科学知识视作一种意识形态而检视其内生价值及文化力量时,也能清楚发现科学及技术的背后性质,常能挑战、威胁甚至破坏自由民主政治体制的基本原则与运作。
SSK应用在科学史领域的完备、经典著作。中文版评论区似乎有人不知道这个背景,没看明白还打一星……
The foundational text for the material turn in history of science.
批判辉格史观;Boyle认为实验是产生自然哲学知识的前提,the matter of facts可证伪并独立于人的能动性而存在,但用于生产科学事实的空气泵的设计缺陷却让Hobbes等对实验方法的怀疑者找到批判依据。
good af: come to the *moment* of demarcation/a history of science is a history of politics, and vice versa
Z-Library