书籍 Revolutionary Waves的封面

Revolutionary Waves

Tie Xiao

出版时间

2017-08-06

ISBN

9780674977167

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

During China’s transition from dynastic empire to nation-state, the crowd emerged as a salient trope. Intellectuals across the ideological spectrum have used the crowd trope to ruminate on questions of selfhood and nationhood, and to advance competing models of enlightenment and revolution.

Revolutionary Waves analyzes the centrality of the crowd in the Chinese cultural and political imagination and its global resonances by delving into a wide range of fiction, philosophy, poetry, and psychological studies. Bringing together literary studies, intellectual history, critical theory, and the history of human sciences, this interdisciplinary work highlights unexplored interactions among emerging social-scientific forms of knowledge, new aesthetic modes of representation, and changing political imperatives. The work brings into relief the complexities of the modern Chinese crowd discourse, which generated subjectivities and oriented actions, enabled as well as constrained the expression of togetherness, and thus both expanded and limited the horizon of political possibilities in the emerging age of mass politics.

The first in-depth examination of the aesthetics and politics of the crowd in modern Chinese literature and thought, Revolutionary Waves raises questions about the promise and peril of community as communion and reimagines collective life in China’s post-socialist present.

Tie Xiao is Assistant Professor in the Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures at Indiana University.

目录
List of Illustrations
1. Zheng Yefu, “August 1, 1933,” 1933.
2. Ke Bu, “Advance,” 1928.
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations

显示全部
用户评论
作者想要处理的是从群众的污名化(知识分子的纠结)到延安改造,WG的神圣化群众的脉络。一边是先锋党的问题,一边是非理性的情感的角色的问题。问题是群“的概念太大了,以至于有点变成一个什么都能装的筐(想象),在串起历史叙事的时候容易流于表面,而不够有穿透力。20C的前半个50年,跨度很大,野心也很大,但是感觉无法在一个文学史的框架(虽然作者显然是跨学科了)下完成。忽略具体的社会史语境(阶层,阶级,到底是什么人群),忽略群学(社会学)的其他发展,撑不起来这么大个题目。感觉更适合这本书的深层线索是:城市史和农村的问题(crowd在特定的语境下到底指的是大都会的驳杂人群还是农村的农民群众);身体和情感的问题;无政府主义与大众革命关系的问题。比较有启发的点是勒庞和朱谦之的个案串起前后的对照。
应该被更多重视
現代中國的「群眾」概念
第三章写得最出色,也最见功力。如小说《倪焕之》所表现出来的,群众力量既有改天换地的斗志,也可能沦为Tiger Jiang的催眠术一般的独裁政治的附庸。主人公的心志与“群众”同呼吸,因看到群众的热望而欣喜,因看到被催眠的群众而心灰。这本小说正如肖铁所论,涉及到的是人民大众的情志如何真正表达和抒发出来。
标一个introduction。用英文做概念史的问题是,对应的中文词细微的变化很容易被忽略,比如从群到群众,其中必然有一个语言、词源、翻译上的原因。探索现代时期知识的建立,用群众心理学和现代心理学的建设无可厚非,但忽视社会学(群学)对这个话题而言实在有点说不过去。intro不是一个好的prospectus范本,分段话题有些显然了(不太值得被论述),看不到真正wrestle with的问题意识(啊啊啊但我自己也是)。
Getting insipid while proceeding toward its end.