书籍 The World, the Text, and the Critic的封面

The World, the Text, and the Critic

Edward W. Said

出版时间

1983-06-10

ISBN

9780674961876

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

This extraordinarily wide-ranging work represents a new departure for contemporary literary theory. Author of "Beginnings" and the controversial "Orientalism," Edward Said demonstrates that modern critical discourse has been impressively strengthened by the writings of Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault, for example, and by such influences as Marxism, structuralism, linguistics, and psychoanalysis. He argues, however, that the various methods and schools have had a crippling effect through their tendency to force works of literature to meet the requirements of a theory or system, ignoring the complex affiliations binding the texts to the world. The critic must maintain a distance both from critical systems and from the dogmas and orthodoxies of the dominant culture, Said contends. He advocates freedom of consciousness and responsiveness to history, to the exigencies of the text, to political, social, and human values, to the heterogeneity of human experience. These characteristics are brilliantly exemplified in his own analyses of individual authors and works. Combining the principles and practice of criticism, the book offers illuminating investigations of a number of writers--Swift, Conrad, Lukacs, Renan, and many others--and of concepts such as repetition, originality, worldliness, and the roles of audiences, authors, and speakers. It asks daring questions, investigates problems of urgent significance, and gives a subtle yet powerful new meaning to the enterprise of criticism in modern society.

目录
Introduction: Secular Criticism
1. The World, the Text, and the Critic
2. Swift’s Tory Anarchy
3. Swift as Intellectual
4. Conrad: The Presentation of Narrative

显示全部
用户评论
文本的世俗和偶然。
与你共度
書名真好,一語道盡不過如此。多年後重溫仍很受激勵。 Texts are worldly; texts are events. (4) 問題不在於critical theory而在於critical consciousness。沒有這樣的批判意識,批判理論也會淪為「organized dogma」(29)。趨之若鶩的路和無人問津的路,「slavish attitude」(144)與「the critical critical history」(149)的缺席正互為表裏。想想都是樸素的道理。
用更激进、颠覆的观点看的话其实理论旅行的origin和destination之分也是个神话,萨义德因此成为后来一些比较文学研究的靶子
萨义德的“在世性”(Worldliness)这个概念的伟大之处是要放在context中来理解的:a)面对从Russian formalism到New criticism到Deconstruction以来越来越把文本抽离出现实存在的一种趋势,萨义德通过“在世性”概念做出了理论层面的反抗;b)也许是更重要的,萨义德一生用文字进行的政治介入,印证和践行了在世性的理念。他的《东方学》、《文化与帝国主义》,更不用说《巴勒斯坦问题》,那都不是用来赚点文化资本的东西,而是真正的政治斗争。“批评家”和“文本”与“世界”是一体的,也许有海德格尔的影响,但远远超出后者的真诚
大师也玩the good the bad the ugly的梗
标记出陷阱所在,是否就彻底避免落入呢?