Articulating Reasons - Robert B. Brandom

Articulating Reasons

Robert B. Brandom

出版时间

2001-10-15

ISBN

9780674006928

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍
Robert B. Brandom is one of the most original philosophers of our day, whose book Making It Explicit covered and extended a vast range of topics in metaphysics, epistemology, and philosophy of language--the very core of analytic philosophy. This new work provides an approachable introduction to the complex system that Making It Explicit mapped out. A tour of the earlier book's large ideas and relevant details, Articulating Reasons offers an easy entry into two of the main themes of Brandom's work: the idea that the semantic content of a sentence is determined by the norms governing inferences to and from it, and the idea that the distinctive function of logical vocabulary is to let us make our tacit inferential commitments explicit.

Brandom's work, making the move from representationalism to inferentialism, constitutes a near-Copernican shift in the philosophy of language--and the most important single development in the field in recent decades. Articulating Reasons puts this accomplishment within reach of nonphilosophers who want to understand the state of the foundations of semantics.
精彩摘录
  • "两个断言具有同样的概念内容,当且仅当它们具有同样的推论作用:一个好的推论绝不可能由于一个断言替换为另一个断言而变成坏的推论。这种明确解释目标——各种语义学理论,包括各种指称理论,都朝向这一目标——的方式被弗雷格的学生卡尔纳普所学得,他在《语言的逻辑句法》中,将一个语句的内容定义为作为它的后果(即可以从它那里推导出来)的无效(nonvalid)语句的类。"
作者简介
Robert B. Brandom is Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh and a Fellow of both the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the British Academy. He delivered the John Locke Lectures at the University of Oxford and the Woodbridge Lectures at Columbia University. Brandom is the author of many books, including Making It Explicit, Reason in Philosophy, and From Empiricism to Expressivism.
用户评论
比“弄懂”好读多了,基本立场其实并不复杂。布兰顿在对黑格尔的提炼上有些自相矛盾,对于历史和自然的区分,其实否定了对于事物自身的认知,但推论主义承诺这种认知18年后的今日,他依旧持有这一立场,并以概念实在论来表述之。初步印象这里隐含着一种麦兜或阿利森式的对康德解读方式的类比或借鉴。
推论主义导出的观点大都可以视为捍卫某种常识,伟大的刘易斯的模态逻辑贡献在布兰顿那里有着诸多体现,但是布兰顿在哲学上的野心:形式语义和实质语用的串通,也难免用到很多罗蒂的思路,并且他确实在另一位大爹黑格尔那里找到了充沛的理论资源(在这本导论里似乎还不够明显),在本书中(或者这个阶段的布兰顿作品里)更多的还有他们(指美国哲学界)对康德的“另类解读”的应用
5、6非常thought-provoking。读的时候觉得是flesh out ethics里面nagel、darwall关注的sharability of reasons的一个非常自然的思路,但好像还没有看到过类似的尝试
布兰顿对“discursive—nondisursive连续性证成”采取了某种务实的立场——我知道它重要,但我真不知道还能说些什么新东西。我已经保留了不少杜威式的“经验”,如果还要提高黑格尔的浓度,罗蒂恐怕要跟我割席断交🚬
断断续续花了半年才看完这本书。是对之前Brandom爷爷的大部头MIE的一个缩略介绍。我基本是从逻辑出发来看这本书的,如果知道模型论和证明论在形式逻辑里面的应用,理解Brandom爷爷的推导主义的主张其实并不是很困难。一开始想看Brandom是因为博士论文里面需要用到推导主义和证明论,所以相比较熟悉的是他对于断言、commitment和entitlement statuses的论述(要感谢那位捷克的哲学家爷爷)。真的看完这本书以后发现,Brandom爷爷的思想其实更深邃,如果再想及他在最后竟然是回归到了黑格尔,就觉得更是奇妙了。不过我不是哲学生,所以只能隔靴骚扰。Brandom在当代分析哲学上是如此重要的一个人,不知道为什么国内一直都没有翻译过他的书,有些让人失望。
收藏