书籍 The Essential Difference的封面

The Essential Difference

Simon Baron-Cohen

出版社

Basic Books

出版时间

2004-07-28

ISBN

9780465005567

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍
We all know the opposite sex can be a baffling, even infuriating, species. Why do most men use the phone to exchange information rather than have a chat? Why do women love talking about relationships and feelings with their girlfriends while men seem drawn to computer games, new gadgets, or the latest sports scores? Does it really all just come down to our upbringing? In The Essential Difference , leading psychologist Simon Baron-Cohen confirms what most of us had suspected all along: that male and female brains are different. This groundbreaking and controversial study reveals the scientific evidence (present even in one-day-old babies) that proves that female-type brains are better at empathizing and communicating, while male brains are stronger at understanding and building systems-not just computers and machinery, but abstract systems such as politics and music. Most revolutionary of all, The Essential Difference also puts forward the compelling new theory that autism (and its close relative, Asperger's Syndrome) is actually an example of the extreme male brain. His theory can explain why those who live with this condition are brilliant at analyzing the most complex systems yet cannot relate to the emotional lives of those with whom they live. Understanding our essential difference, Baron-Cohen concludes, may help us not only make sense of our partners' foibles, but also solve one of the most mysterious scientific riddles of our time.
用户评论
最后四章感觉可以略过,前六章所有论据都没有直接给出男女行为上的差别在大脑上的体现,所有间接论据都依靠“如果男女行为上的差别在所有文化族群间都存在,那么这种差别就可以由男女大脑上的差别来解释”;对于看似最具有说服力的对刚出生婴儿所做的研究的结果如何能支撑empathizing/systemizing的男女差异,作者也未作说明,女婴更偏好看脸不一定就代表empathizing更强(可能女婴看它只是想打它,此外女婴更偏好看脸的结论也不完全可靠,研究中的女婴近半数并没有偏好),男婴更偏好看一个system也不代表他当时是在systemizing。中心论题的hardwired的含义也不明确,可能同时涉及刚出生就存在的差异,受基因控制的差异,受荷尔蒙影响的差异,不同文化中共有的差异,其它动物中也有的差异
感谢长者的推荐
an essential guide to autism, for everybody
女性大脑(同理心)和男性大脑(系统性)的本质不同,自闭症是极端男性大脑的表现。
如果作者认为“理性”和“感性”对立,有它无我,那他十分愚蠢(Monica Sjoo说patriarchy喜欢搞二元对立)。如果作者不这么想,但真的认为女性有感情没逻辑,男性有逻辑没感情,那他在为男尊女卑找合理性,又蠢又坏。再说如果女性真的天生更善于社交,那她们也应该更擅长搞郑智而非喝下午茶,因为人是社会关系的总和,社交难道不涉及权衡利弊吗?不仅如此,他的主张被反驳依旧嘴硬(女助手反而认识到自己的局限),又提出asd极端男性脑这种无法被证实的谬论然后继续嘴硬。
Z-Library