Postdramatic Theatre - Hans-Thies Lehmann

Postdramatic Theatre

Hans-Thies Lehmann

出版社

Routledge

出版时间

2006-05-03

ISBN

9780415268134

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

Newly adapted for the Anglophone reader, this is an excellent translation of Hans-Thies Lehmann's groundbreaking study of the new theatre forms that have developed since the late 1960s, which has become a key reference point in international discussions of contemporary theatre. In looking at the developments since the late 1960s, Lehmann considers them in relation to dramatic theory and theatre history, as an inventive response to the emergence of new technologies, and as an historical shift from a text-based culture to a new media age of image and sound. Engaging with theoreticians of 'drama' from Aristotle and Brecht, to Barthes and Schechner, the book analyzes the work of recent experimental theatre practitioners such as Robert Wilson, Tadeusz Kantor, Heiner Muller, the Wooster Group, Needcompany and Societas Raffaello Sanzio. Illustrated by a wealth of practical examples, and with an introduction by Karen Jurs-Munby providing useful theoretical and artistic contexts for the book, Postdramatic Theatre is an historical survey expertly combined with a unique theoretical approach which guides the reader through this new theatre landscape.

Hans-Thies Lehmann is Professor of Theatre Studies at the Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. His numerous publications include Theater und Mythos (1991) on the constitution of the subject in ancient Greek tragedy, Writing the Political (2002) and, with Patrick Primavesi, Heiner Müller Handbuch (2004).

Karen Jürs-Munby is Senior Lecturer in Drama, Th...

(展开全部)

用户评论
不读两边以上我是读不懂的…
这版翻译太纠结了~扫描好留下来!
语境原因,看英文翻译的确比看中文翻译要容易吸收一点;但,德国人写的东西实在是太缺乏趣味……最后两章抛出了些自己的私货观点看得人精神一振,但前面那些不分段的长篇大论闷而啰嗦,有些话需要这么讲吗?He might be a scholar but not a good writer.
后现代剧场什么的,对于现在熟悉现代戏剧的观众来说,也没有什么震惊的观点,倒是在时空那块讲得很清楚(我都能看懂,没人看不懂了吧)
终于看完了T T可能哲学化也是从戏剧美学角度给后戏剧剧场定位的必需吧 但太难读了 不是定义是现象总结 但每一条美学原则都符合的大概是Wilson(也提到太多遍)分析的语言除哲学/艺术理论外很多来自其他门类的现代艺术 也的确剧场是在follow their path只是走得较慢 剧场各元素(Aspects)的深度分析写得特别好 啧啧称奇 但由于是umbrella term 偶尔就会嘀咕:前面才说符号堆叠/共时,拒绝阐释,怎么讲到很多作品还是忍不住要提一嘴:“表现出了……”?// 我的想法:比起哲学,更可以从演剧史角度谈论,比如说声音和身体的automony,为什么不讲后戏剧剧场和传统歌剧/舞蹈的联系/区别?后记的政治剧场小析是我好奇的,但讲得不在理,而且戏剧剧场概念突然混用。英译很好,不容易。
详实
all-encompassing, 清晰、严整、干净利落,panorama无所不包
该书调理清晰,从比较新古典主义及之前的亚里士多德式戏剧和现代、后戏剧剧场来对后戏剧剧场这一名词界定,到中间部分归纳、分类总结后戏剧剧场特征,再到最后提出自己对后戏剧剧场的看法。看起来非常顺,除了德国人的书,语言结构上很无聊,哪怕是英译版也很无聊。 (小声bb,中间找来中文版的对照了一些名词,中文版的翻译看起来好晦涩,给人一种“这是什么鬼”的感觉)
德国学者吧,还是讲悲剧和亚里士多德传统的dramatic theatre讲的比较好....
收藏