书籍 Censors at Work的封面

Censors at Work

Robert Darnton

出版时间

2014-09-22

ISBN

9780393242294

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍
This absorbing history by a brilliant scholar and writer deepens our understanding of how censorship works. With his uncanny ability to spark life in the past, Robert Darnton re-creates three historical worlds in which censorship shaped literary expression in distinctive ways. In eighteenth-century France, censors, authors, and booksellers collaborated in making literature by navigating the intricate culture of royal privilege. Even as the king's censors outlawed works by Voltaire, Rousseau, and other celebrated Enlightenment writers, the head censor himself incubated Diderot’s great Encyclopedie by hiding the banned project’s papers in his Paris townhouse. Relationships at court trumped principle in the Old Regime. Shaken by the Sepoy uprising in 1857, the British Raj undertook a vast surveillance of every aspect of Indian life, including its literary output. Years later the outrage stirred by the British partition of Bengal led the Raj to put this knowledge to use. Seeking to suppress Indian publications that it deemed seditious, the British held hearings in which literary criticism led to prison sentences. Their efforts to meld imperial power and liberal principle fed a growing Indian opposition. In Communist East Germany, censorship was a component of the party program to engineer society. Behind the unmarked office doors of Ninety Clara-Zetkin Street in East Berlin, censors developed annual plans for literature in negotiation with high party officials and prominent writers. A system so pervasive that it lodged inside the authors’ heads as self-censorship, it left visible scars in the nation’s literature. By rooting censorship in the particulars of history, Darnton's revealing study enables us to think more clearly about efforts to control expression past and present.
用户评论
所用的档案材料乃至访谈材料体现了审查元素在各种不同构成性环节中的功能化,提出要不被所谓“权利和对权利的压制”的公式所束缚,结论中从另一个方面指出,要避免将限制性、压迫性的审查权力泛化和细琐化为无处不在的社会参数。波旁法国的审查在于荣誉特权的授予,东德审查工作关注文学之国的建设,这些都使得具体的审查活动有了生产性的指向,而英国人在殖民地印度的对煽动文艺的审判受到自由主义原则的掣肘,也讲究弄清文本的阐释和读者接受问题,尽量在形式上显得公正。但我很难看出,本书用它所谓深描方法呈现出的研究有何特殊之处:在具体论述中还是材料+基于作者零散的、先在原则的小评论。其中零散涉及国际因素对作品内容、出版、接受和审查状况的参与构造,是有意思的点。
这本书有中文版吗。。
Z-Library