Beyond Nature and Culture - Philippe Descola

Beyond Nature and Culture

Philippe Descola

出版时间

2013-06-01

ISBN

9780226144450

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

Philippe Descola has become one of the most important anthropologists working today, and Beyond Nature and Culture has been a major influence in European intellectual life since its French publication in 2005. Here, finally, it is brought to English-language readers. At its heart is a question central to both anthropology and philosophy: what is the relationship between nature and culture?

Culture—as a collective human making, of art, language, and so forth—is often seen as essentially different from nature, which is portrayed as a collective of the nonhuman world, of plants, animals, geology, and natural forces. Descola shows this essential difference to be, however, not only a specifically Western notion, but also a very recent one. Drawing on ethnographic examples from around the world and theoretical understandings from cognitive science, structural analysis, and phenomenology, he formulates a sophisticated new framework, the “four ontologies”— animism, totemism, naturalism, and analogism—to account for all the ways we relate ourselves to nature. By thinking beyond nature and culture as a simple dichotomy, Descola offers nothing short of a fundamental reformulation by which anthropologists and philosophers can see the world afresh.

Philippe Descola holds the chair of anthropology and heads the Laboratoire d’anthropologie sociale at the Collège de France. He also teaches at the École des hautes études en sciences sociales. Among his previous books to appear in English are In the Society of Nature and The Spears of Twilight.

目录
Foreword
Preface
Acknowledgments
I Trompe-l’Oeil Nature
1 Configurations of Continuity

显示全部
用户评论
虽然很易被说服,但并非无懈可击。
3.5
课程要求。我翻译得一塌糊涂。
虽然很多人批评其僵化,不过后结构主义是有动态性的,而且也很有趣,需要仔细深入文本才能感受到。我对法国人的理论有偏见,觉得他们总喜欢兜圈子讲话,这本也是,讲话很绕,但同时逻辑又很清晰。总结一下,哈哈,我还是不喜欢,但又不得不看。
6、7、8、9、10
名气过大,但处理并没有胜过Haraway或者Latour多少
挺好用的就是ontology这个词被滥用了
再读,感觉可以完全扔掉了。作者想用这个模型来解释什么感觉他自己也没有想清楚,内在性和物质性不是双重本体论,而是一个指向person-non-person,另一个指向human-non-human。将图腾论与其他三种相提并论并不恰当,因为其他三类适用于所有物质,而图腾论只针对特定物质,图腾论和类比论实质上是一个连续体,由此可见作者缺乏对空间尺度的把握。认为西方自然科学原子论是物质连续性而中国的物质观是断裂性的代表也非常离谱。
一部经常被人误以为启发了ontology turn的大作,实际上partial connection对vdc的启发更大吧
收藏