Writing for Social Scientists

Howard S. Becker

出版时间

1986-03-15

ISBN

9780226041087

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍

Social scientists, whether earnest graduate students or tenured faculty members, clearly know the rules that govern good writing. But for some reason they choose to ignore those guidelines and churn out turgid, pompous, and obscure prose. Distinguished sociologist Howard S. Becker, true to his calling, looks for an explanation for this bizarre behavior not in the psyches of his colleagues but in the structure of his profession. In this highly personal and inspirational volume he considers academic writing as a social activity.

Both the means and the reasons for writing a thesis or article or book are socially structured by the organization of graduate study, the requirements for publication, and the conditions for promotion, and the pressures arising from these situations create the writing style so often lampooned and lamented. Drawing on his thirty-five years' experience as a researcher, writer, and teacher, Becker exposes the foibles of the academic profession to the light of sociological analysis and gentle humor. He also offers eminently useful suggestions for ways to make social scientists better and more productive writers. Among the topics discussed are how to overcome the paralyzing fears of chaos and ridicule that lead to writer's block; how to rewrite and revise, again and again; how to adopt a persona compatible with lucid prose; how to deal with that academic bugaboo, "the literature." There is also a chapter by Pamela Richards on the personal and professional risks involved in scholarly writing.

In recounting his own trials and errors Becker offers his readers not a model to be slavishly imitated but an example to inspire. Throughout, his focus is on the elusive work habits that contribute to good writing, not the more easily learned rules of grammar and punctuation. Although his examples are drawn from sociological literature, his conclusions apply to all fields of social science, and indeed to all areas of scholarly endeavor. The message is clear: you don't have to write like a social scientist to be one.

AI导读
核心看点
  • 将学术写作视为社会活动,剖析职业结构对文风的影响
  • 提倡先写后改,通过快速初稿克服写作恐惧与拖延
  • 强调说人话,反对晦涩冗长,主张清晰直接的表达
适合谁读
  • 深受写作焦虑困扰的社会科学研究生与青年学者
  • 希望提升学术文章可读性与逻辑清晰度的研究者
  • 对学术体制与写作规范关系感兴趣的社会学人士
读前提醒
  • 本书侧重心理疏导与写作观念,具体技巧建议少
  • 语言风格较为口语化,部分观点可能显得啰嗦
  • 建议结合其他写作手册,互补心理与技巧指导
读者共识
  • 直击写作痛点,有效缓解学术写作的心理恐慌
  • 核心建议是勤动笔、反复改、用通俗语言表达
  • 虽技巧有限,但对破除完美主义拖延症极有帮助

本导读基于书籍简介、目录、原文摘录、短评和书评生成,不等同于全文精读。

精彩摘录
  • "这个方法使你能够完美地学习到一点:那些真正作数的都是最终版作品,井且没有人会对你错误的开头或不正确的观点提出指责,只要你在写作过程中找到了一些好的东西就行。"
  • "思想生活是对同一个话题感兴趣的人们之间的对话。你可以偷偷旁听这种对话并从中学习,但最终你自己也该为它添砖加瓦。你的研究一旦完成,就应该把它写出来,并通过发表而让它加人这种对话。"
  • "过去,发表作品的主要目的是让人们了解某个领域里最新的科研和思想发展,但现在它有了一个新的让人讨厌的职责——在大学决定雇用哪些人或给哪些人终身教职的程序中,它也是一部分。你通过发表文章——尤其在舆论视为“最好”的期刊上发表文章——而获得一份工作(特别是“好”工作)并获得升职。"
  • "Sociologists often prefer locutions that leave the answer to that question unclear, largely because many of their theories don't tell them who is doing what. In many sociological theories, things just happen without anyone doing them"
  • "Sociologists' inability or unwillingness to make causal statements similarly leads to bad writing (...) Sociologists have many ways of describing how elements covary, most of them vacuous expressions hinting at what would like, but don't dare, to say."
  • "Should such a theorist use passive constructions to indicate the passivity of the human actors involved? That question requires two answers. The simpler is that few serious theories of society leave no room for agency. (...) passive constructions even hide the agency attributed to systems and struct"
  • "We agreed that the way to work with such a draft was to take notes on it, see what it contained, and then make an outline for another draft (..) Worrying about those faults might slow you down, keep you from saying something in one of the ways that would give you the clue you needed. Better edit aft"
  • "He showed how writers in the students' own field manipulated stylistic devices to sound "scientific", particularly noting how passive constructions could produce a facade of impersonality the investigator could hide behind"
用户评论
写作是一门艺术。10秒内让读者厌烦,就会被淘汰
读完才发现已经有了中文版,但加了个不准确的标题。
好书,提出了写作恐惧症,拖延症的应对方案。作者认为,写作,尤其是第一稿,一定不能怀有太大负担,提出“急速直觉初稿写作法”,有啥写啥,在写作中思考,最后通过不断revision来架构框架,修正逻辑,以及流畅文字。每章前面的小漫画加一星。
不错。喜欢其对free writing和投稿的阐释。
从“写作恐惧症”的角度来说使我认识到大家都是一样的。。不过还是得写得改么。他提的把同事的早期草稿拿过来让学生一起做修改和批评的招感觉很好也!
收藏