书籍 Hamlet的封面

Hamlet

Shakespeare, William/ Hibbard, G. R. (EDT)

出版社

OUP Oxford

出版时间

2008-04-17

ISBN

9780199535811

评分

★★★★★
书籍介绍
Hamlet's combination of violence and introspection is unusual among Shakespeare's tragedies. It is also full of curious riddles and fascinating paradoxes, making it one of his most widely discussed plays. Professor Hibbard's illuminating and original introduction explains the process by which variant texts were fused in the eighteenth century to create the most commonly used text of today. Drawing on both critical and theatrical history, he shows how this gusion makes Hamlet seem a much more 'problematic' play than it was when it originally appeared in the First Folio of 1623. The Oxford Shakespeare edition presents a radically new text, based on that First Folio, which printed Shakespeare's own revision of an earlier version. The result is a 'theatrical' and highly practical edition for students and actors alike. ABOUT THE SERIES: For over 100 years Oxford World's Classics has made available the widest range of literature from around the globe. Each affordable volume reflects Oxford's commitment to scholarship, providing the most accurate text plus a wealth of other valuable features, including expert introductions by leading authorities, helpful notes to clarify the text, up-to-date bibliographies for further study, and much more.
用户评论
硬着头皮读完了。很多地方不明,却觉厉。
注释赞;既可看作是情感淋漓虬结扣人心弦的一出戏,也能看作是大背景下个人意识与灵魂在冉冉升起,有时候两种感觉交织,更神会其深。这样在暴烈或细微的情绪间来去,词句却又毫不含糊拖沓地精确,真有千钧的笔力。最后一幕噼里啪啦的节奏竟然还想到了《雷雨》,都可叹
这版注释很棒,先标记一下 1.哈姆雷特之所以是哈姆雷特就在于他的不确定性。他似真似假的疯狂,在思与行之间的踌躇不定,他的睿智博学和冲动鲁莽,以及他无休无止的 “toxic mind game”,让奥菲莉亚成了最悲剧的受害者。 2. 哈姆雷特对女性的态度,对母亲的恋母情结(疑似),对奥菲莉亚的厌女倾向。 3. A3S2 莎翁以哈姆雷特的视角亲自教演员演戏! 4.To be or not to be哈姆雷特对自杀以及死后世界的思索。哈姆雷特没有选择自杀,而奥菲莉亚选择了not to be,或者,她没得选,女性在这一部剧里,无论是奥菲莉亚还是皇后,似乎都没有选择的机会。脆弱啊,你的名字就是女人。笑 5.疯狂。“Something is rotten in the state of Denmark”
结构太过精妙,小女子脑汁搅尽
看了学校的adaptation 太强了
内心独白很多,有些句子有点绕没太懂。可能因为在戏剧社演过Hamlet的角色已经熟悉剧情,对于故事没有很陌生。悲剧的造成不是一蹴而就的,每一个参与者的选择都对结局有不可撼动的影响。
我真没看懂
版本之考部分还挺好玩的,文学研究常常也是侦探行动。
每周上课都有新体悟。对3.1三段论soliloquy的分析让我惊觉自己理性与秉性的断裂。当提出“to be or not to be”的问题时,我不假思索地认为结论必然是“to be”或者“not to be”,但实际上Hamlet得出的结论却是“conscious doth make cowards of us all”。每一次具体的问题,他得出的都是抽象结论,而这么多年的阅读,我竟从未发现其中有问题。Hamlet的性格悲剧在于,他知道该怎么做但做不到,于是一次次abuse自己。他没有解决问题的能力,因为他首先没有解决问题的兴趣。在人生的难题面前进行思辨,在认知上得出结论,这才是他确认自我的方式,至于复仇与否,实在非其关切所在。但境遇将他推到不得不决策的位置,这是个性与环境不适配的悲剧。
Z-Library